Talen en spiralen: kennis en besluitvorming in anticonceptieconsultaties met een taalbarrière

Ella van Hest, J. De Wilde
{"title":"Talen en spiralen: kennis en besluitvorming in anticonceptieconsultaties met een taalbarrière","authors":"Ella van Hest, J. De Wilde","doi":"10.5117/tvt2021.2.003.vanh","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Misconception and contraception: knowledge and decision-making in contraceptive consultations with a language barrier\n \n Just like in general medical consultations, different domains of knowledge come together and are negotiated in contraceptive consultations, followed by decision-making on the contraceptive method. Research shows that a language barrier can hamper knowledge negotiation and decision-making in medical consultations. Our paper contributes to those findings by focussing on contraceptive counselling as a specific and underexplored consultation type. We gathered our data in a Belgian abortion clinic, where contraception is discussed during the consultations, and where an important part of the consultations are characterised by a language barrier. We adopt a Bourdieusian view on language as capital, and use a linguistic ethnographic and interactional sociolinguistic approach, complemented with analytical tools from conversation analysis on epistemics and deontics. The analysis of data fragments, ranging from a limited to a double language barrier, shows that this barrier is connected in various ways with how, and how much, knowledge is negotiated. Incomplete renditions, interruptions, epistemic and deontic claims from non-professional interpreters, along with a lack of shared contextualisation, impede clients to gather information and therefore influence decision-making. We conclude that a language barrier involves a potential risk for knowledge negotiation and decision-making in contraceptive consultations. More attention from healthcare professionals to language barriers could empower women in their sexual and reproductive health choices.","PeriodicalId":192335,"journal":{"name":"Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5117/tvt2021.2.003.vanh","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Misconception and contraception: knowledge and decision-making in contraceptive consultations with a language barrier Just like in general medical consultations, different domains of knowledge come together and are negotiated in contraceptive consultations, followed by decision-making on the contraceptive method. Research shows that a language barrier can hamper knowledge negotiation and decision-making in medical consultations. Our paper contributes to those findings by focussing on contraceptive counselling as a specific and underexplored consultation type. We gathered our data in a Belgian abortion clinic, where contraception is discussed during the consultations, and where an important part of the consultations are characterised by a language barrier. We adopt a Bourdieusian view on language as capital, and use a linguistic ethnographic and interactional sociolinguistic approach, complemented with analytical tools from conversation analysis on epistemics and deontics. The analysis of data fragments, ranging from a limited to a double language barrier, shows that this barrier is connected in various ways with how, and how much, knowledge is negotiated. Incomplete renditions, interruptions, epistemic and deontic claims from non-professional interpreters, along with a lack of shared contextualisation, impede clients to gather information and therefore influence decision-making. We conclude that a language barrier involves a potential risk for knowledge negotiation and decision-making in contraceptive consultations. More attention from healthcare professionals to language barriers could empower women in their sexual and reproductive health choices.
语言与螺旋:有语言障碍的避孕咨询中的知识与决策
误解与避孕:有语言障碍的避孕咨询中的知识与决策 就像一般的医疗咨询一样,在避孕咨询中,不同领域的知识会汇聚在一起并进行协商,然后就避孕方法做出决策。研究表明,语言障碍会妨碍医疗咨询中的知识协商和决策。我们的论文将重点放在避孕咨询上,将其作为一种特殊的、未被充分探索的咨询类型,从而为这些研究成果做出贡献。我们在比利时的一家人工流产诊所收集了数据,该诊所在问诊过程中讨论避孕问题,而问诊的一个重要部分就是语言障碍。我们采用布尔迪厄斯(Bourdieusian)将语言视为资本的观点,使用语言人种学和互动社会语言学方法,并辅以认识论和义务论对话分析工具。对从有限语言障碍到双重语言障碍的数据片段进行的分析表明,这种障碍与知识的协商方式和协商程度有着不同的联系。非专业口译员的不完整翻译、打断、认识论和义务论主张,以及缺乏共同语境,都阻碍了客户收集信息,从而影响决策。我们的结论是,语言障碍对避孕咨询中的知识协商和决策具有潜在风险。医护人员对语言障碍给予更多关注,可以增强妇女在性健康和生殖健康选择方面的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信