Methodological Preparation of a Within-Subject Audiovisual Cognition, Reception and Perception Study

Senne M. Van Hoecke, I. Schrijver, I. Robert
{"title":"Methodological Preparation of a Within-Subject Audiovisual Cognition, Reception and Perception Study","authors":"Senne M. Van Hoecke, I. Schrijver, I. Robert","doi":"10.47476/jat.v5i1.2022.163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the past decade, cognitive empirical AVT research has been on the rise. The majority of these studies are between-subject studies, focused on subtitles for the deaf and hard of hearing (SDH). The few experimental studies that are aimed at other audiences tend to have small sample sizes. Within-subject studies are rarely used in experimental AVT cognition, reception and perception research, although they can increase statistical power due to the repeated testing and shed light on the idiosyncratic nature of the matter. This paper pleads for the introduction of complementary within-subject designs by illustrating the contrasts between the within-subject and between-subject research design. Drawing from the broader spectrum of Translation Studies and the case of the Subtitles for Access to Education (S4AE) research project, this paper highlights obstacles in the preparation of a within-subject AVT cognition, reception and perception experiment and proposes a possible approach to prepare similar within-subject AVT studies.\nLay summary\nIn the past decade, experimental research into Audiovisual Translation (AVT), such as subtitles, has been on the rise. A common problem in this research, however, is a lack of participants. With fewer participants, the accuracy and generalizability of a study remains limited.\nTo cope with this issue, this paper recommends the use of within-subject designs alongside the more common between-subject designs (mixed designs). A within-subject design study tests the same participants in multiple conditions and essentially collects more data per participant. Furthermore, as the same participant is tested multiple times, individual differences no longer play a role and different test conditions can be compared more easily. Currently, the use of within-subject or mixed designs is limited in AVT research.\nA within-subject study should be carefully prepared as a number of factors could influence the results. For example, participants could become tired after multiple tests or there could be an unwanted difference between the test conditions. This paper proposes a ten-step process to prepare a within-subject AVT study. This paper only discusses the first six steps, which deal with producing and comparing core materials for the study. The production and comparison of subtitles (AVT) will be discussed in a future article.","PeriodicalId":203332,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Audiovisual Translation","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Audiovisual Translation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47476/jat.v5i1.2022.163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In the past decade, cognitive empirical AVT research has been on the rise. The majority of these studies are between-subject studies, focused on subtitles for the deaf and hard of hearing (SDH). The few experimental studies that are aimed at other audiences tend to have small sample sizes. Within-subject studies are rarely used in experimental AVT cognition, reception and perception research, although they can increase statistical power due to the repeated testing and shed light on the idiosyncratic nature of the matter. This paper pleads for the introduction of complementary within-subject designs by illustrating the contrasts between the within-subject and between-subject research design. Drawing from the broader spectrum of Translation Studies and the case of the Subtitles for Access to Education (S4AE) research project, this paper highlights obstacles in the preparation of a within-subject AVT cognition, reception and perception experiment and proposes a possible approach to prepare similar within-subject AVT studies. Lay summary In the past decade, experimental research into Audiovisual Translation (AVT), such as subtitles, has been on the rise. A common problem in this research, however, is a lack of participants. With fewer participants, the accuracy and generalizability of a study remains limited. To cope with this issue, this paper recommends the use of within-subject designs alongside the more common between-subject designs (mixed designs). A within-subject design study tests the same participants in multiple conditions and essentially collects more data per participant. Furthermore, as the same participant is tested multiple times, individual differences no longer play a role and different test conditions can be compared more easily. Currently, the use of within-subject or mixed designs is limited in AVT research. A within-subject study should be carefully prepared as a number of factors could influence the results. For example, participants could become tired after multiple tests or there could be an unwanted difference between the test conditions. This paper proposes a ten-step process to prepare a within-subject AVT study. This paper only discusses the first six steps, which deal with producing and comparing core materials for the study. The production and comparison of subtitles (AVT) will be discussed in a future article.
学科内视听认知、接受和感知研究的方法学准备
近十年来,认知实证AVT研究呈上升趋势。这些研究大多是受试者之间的研究,重点是聋人和重听人(SDH)的字幕。少数针对其他受众的实验研究往往样本量较小。受试者内研究很少用于实验性AVT认知、接受和感知研究,尽管它们可以增加统计能力,因为反复测试,并阐明了问题的特殊性。本文通过对学科内研究设计与学科间研究设计的对比,呼吁引入互补的学科内研究设计。从广泛的翻译研究和S4AE研究项目的案例中,本文强调了在准备受试者内AVT认知、接受和感知实验时存在的障碍,并提出了一种准备类似受试者内AVT研究的可能方法。在过去的十年中,对视听翻译(AVT)的实验研究,如字幕,一直在上升。然而,这项研究的一个共同问题是缺乏参与者。由于参与者较少,研究的准确性和普遍性仍然有限。为了解决这个问题,本文建议使用主题内设计以及更常见的主题间设计(混合设计)。主题内设计研究在多种条件下测试相同的参与者,基本上每个参与者收集更多的数据。此外,由于同一参与者被多次测试,个体差异不再起作用,不同的测试条件可以更容易地进行比较。目前,在AVT研究中,主体内设计或混合设计的使用是有限的。主题内研究应仔细准备,因为许多因素可能影响结果。例如,参与者在多次测试后可能会感到疲劳,或者测试条件之间可能存在不必要的差异。本文提出了一个十步的过程来准备一个主题内的AVT研究。本文只讨论了前六个步骤,即生产和比较研究的核心材料。我们将在以后的文章中讨论字幕的制作和比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信