The Regulatory Status Analysis for Updating the Public Legal Awareness on Human Rights in Indonesia

Andreas Tedy Mulyono, R. Pramono
{"title":"The Regulatory Status Analysis for Updating the Public Legal Awareness on Human Rights in Indonesia","authors":"Andreas Tedy Mulyono, R. Pramono","doi":"10.30641/ham.2022.13.459-478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, it is argued that quantitative empirical legal research can support understanding public legal awareness of the implementation of human rights protection in Indonesia. The public legal awareness is analyzed using the Partial Least Square-Structural Equation Modelling to provide flexibility for exploring the link of the ideals of human rights law with elements of the legal system as research variables. This research is a literature study on the importance and use of empirical quantitative research methods through the establishment of a path model called Regulatory Status Analysis. The model positions legal ideals (justice, certainty, and expediency) as an independent variable; while the two elements of the legal system: substantive law and legal structure, are mediating variables. Based on the trial run, the path model can picture the relationship between ideal law and legal culture as the dependent variable in the form of public awareness to comply with legal norms that protect human rights. Substantive law also has a positive influence on awareness to obey the law. However, the legal structure has no influence, either directly or indirectly. It might be because respondents consider law enforcement against human rights violations less than optimal. The test result determines what kind of human rights legal system should be developed for national and global legal scholarship.","PeriodicalId":342655,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal HAM","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal HAM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30641/ham.2022.13.459-478","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, it is argued that quantitative empirical legal research can support understanding public legal awareness of the implementation of human rights protection in Indonesia. The public legal awareness is analyzed using the Partial Least Square-Structural Equation Modelling to provide flexibility for exploring the link of the ideals of human rights law with elements of the legal system as research variables. This research is a literature study on the importance and use of empirical quantitative research methods through the establishment of a path model called Regulatory Status Analysis. The model positions legal ideals (justice, certainty, and expediency) as an independent variable; while the two elements of the legal system: substantive law and legal structure, are mediating variables. Based on the trial run, the path model can picture the relationship between ideal law and legal culture as the dependent variable in the form of public awareness to comply with legal norms that protect human rights. Substantive law also has a positive influence on awareness to obey the law. However, the legal structure has no influence, either directly or indirectly. It might be because respondents consider law enforcement against human rights violations less than optimal. The test result determines what kind of human rights legal system should be developed for national and global legal scholarship.
印尼公众人权法律意识更新的监管现状分析
本研究认为,定量实证法律研究有助于理解印尼公众对人权保护实施的法律意识。利用偏最小二乘结构方程模型分析公众法律意识,为探索人权法理想与法律制度要素作为研究变量的联系提供灵活性。本研究通过建立监管现状分析路径模型,对实证定量研究方法的重要性及运用进行了文献研究。该模型将法律理想(正义、确定性和权宜之计)定位为一个独立变量;而法律制度的两个要素:实体法和法律结构是中介变量。在试运行的基础上,路径模型可以将理想法律与法律文化之间的关系作为因变量,以公众遵守保障人权的法律规范的意识的形式描绘出来。实体法对守法意识也有积极的影响。然而,法律结构没有直接或间接的影响。这可能是因为被访者认为对侵犯人权行为的执法不够理想。测试结果决定了国家和全球法律学术应该发展什么样的人权法律体系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信