Protection of the Weaker Party – to Whom is Labour Law Still Applicable?

Gaabriel Tavits
{"title":"Protection of the Weaker Party – to Whom is Labour Law Still Applicable?","authors":"Gaabriel Tavits","doi":"10.22364/iscflul.8.2.33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"National law is affected by a number of different international regulations and agreements. International agreements provide for rules aimed at harmonizing certain requirements and understandings that different countries should follow. In labour relations, international standards are set at two different levels – on the one hand, by the International Labour Organization (ILO), and on the other by regional standards – by the Council of Europe and the directives and regulations adopted by the European Union. All these international rules have important implications for national labour law. However, such international norms do not provide a clear personal scope – that is, it is not clearly defined to whom such international norms apply. Although the various international rules do not directly define the persons to whom those norms apply, – the implementation of international rules remains a matter for national law. Thus, the concept of both employee and employment relationship is shaped by national law. The exception here is the European Union, where the European Court of Justice has given an autonomous meaning to the concept of worker (particularly in the context of freedom of movement for workers). Although the concept of a worker and of an employment relationship has been developed by the Court of Justice of the European Union, Member States retain the right to define the employment relationship in accordance with the law in force in the respective Member State. The main factor in shaping employment relationships is the employee's dependence on the person providing the work, and the person providing the work also has an obligation to pay remuneration for the work performed. Although the scope of those rules is defined differently by different international rules, the characteristics generally applicable to the definition of an employee and the employment relationship are similar to those used in national law.","PeriodicalId":314457,"journal":{"name":"New Legal Reality: Challenges and Perspectives. II","volume":"s3-21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Legal Reality: Challenges and Perspectives. II","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22364/iscflul.8.2.33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

National law is affected by a number of different international regulations and agreements. International agreements provide for rules aimed at harmonizing certain requirements and understandings that different countries should follow. In labour relations, international standards are set at two different levels – on the one hand, by the International Labour Organization (ILO), and on the other by regional standards – by the Council of Europe and the directives and regulations adopted by the European Union. All these international rules have important implications for national labour law. However, such international norms do not provide a clear personal scope – that is, it is not clearly defined to whom such international norms apply. Although the various international rules do not directly define the persons to whom those norms apply, – the implementation of international rules remains a matter for national law. Thus, the concept of both employee and employment relationship is shaped by national law. The exception here is the European Union, where the European Court of Justice has given an autonomous meaning to the concept of worker (particularly in the context of freedom of movement for workers). Although the concept of a worker and of an employment relationship has been developed by the Court of Justice of the European Union, Member States retain the right to define the employment relationship in accordance with the law in force in the respective Member State. The main factor in shaping employment relationships is the employee's dependence on the person providing the work, and the person providing the work also has an obligation to pay remuneration for the work performed. Although the scope of those rules is defined differently by different international rules, the characteristics generally applicable to the definition of an employee and the employment relationship are similar to those used in national law.
弱者的保护——劳动法对谁还适用?
国内法受到若干不同的国际条例和协定的影响。国际协定规定了旨在协调不同国家应遵守的某些要求和谅解的规则。在劳工关系方面,国际标准是在两个不同的层次上制定的- -一方面是由国际劳工组织(劳工组织)制定的,另一方面是由欧洲理事会和欧洲联盟通过的指令和条例制定的区域标准。所有这些国际规则都对国家劳工法具有重要影响。但是,这种国际规范没有规定明确的个人范围- -也就是说,没有明确规定这种国际规范适用于谁。虽然各种国际规则没有直接界定这些准则适用的人,但国际规则的执行仍然是国内法的问题。因此,雇员和雇佣关系的概念都是由国家法律塑造的。这里的例外是欧盟,欧洲法院赋予了工人这个概念自主的含义(特别是在工人行动自由的背景下)。虽然工人和雇佣关系的概念是由欧洲联盟法院提出的,但成员国保留根据各自成员国的现行法律定义雇佣关系的权利。形成雇佣关系的主要因素是雇员对提供工作的人的依赖,提供工作的人也有义务为所做的工作支付报酬。虽然这些规则的范围在不同的国际规则中有不同的定义,但一般适用于雇员和雇佣关系定义的特征与国内法中使用的特征相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信