Early Detection and Guidelines to Improve Unanswered Questions on Stack Overflow

Saikat Mondal, C. Saifullah, Avijit Bhattacharjee, M. M. Rahman, C. Roy
{"title":"Early Detection and Guidelines to Improve Unanswered Questions on Stack Overflow","authors":"Saikat Mondal, C. Saifullah, Avijit Bhattacharjee, M. M. Rahman, C. Roy","doi":"10.1145/3452383.3452392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Stack Overflow is one of the largest and most popular question-answering (Q&A) websites. It accumulates millions of programming related questions and answers to support the developers in software development. Unfortunately, a large number of questions are not answered at all, which might hurt the quality or purpose of this community-oriented knowledge base. Up to 29% of Stack Overflow questions do not have any answers. There have been existing attempts in detecting the unanswered questions. Unfortunately, they primarily rely on the question attributes (e.g., score, view count) that are not available during the submission of a question. Detection of the potentially unanswered questions in advance during question submission could help one improve the question and thus receive the answers in time. In this paper, we compare unanswered and answered questions quantitatively and qualitatively by analyzing a total of 4.8 million questions from Stack Overflow. We find that topics discussed in the question, the experience of the question submitter, and readability of question texts could often determine whether a question would be answered or not. Our qualitative study also reveals several other non-trivial factors that not only explain (partially) why the questions remain unanswered but also guide the novice users to improve their questions. We develop four machine learning models to predict the unanswered questions during their submission. According to the experiments, our models predict the unanswered questions with a maximum of about 79% accuracy and significantly outperform the state-of-the-art prediction models.","PeriodicalId":378352,"journal":{"name":"14th Innovations in Software Engineering Conference (formerly known as India Software Engineering Conference)","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"14th Innovations in Software Engineering Conference (formerly known as India Software Engineering Conference)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3452383.3452392","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Stack Overflow is one of the largest and most popular question-answering (Q&A) websites. It accumulates millions of programming related questions and answers to support the developers in software development. Unfortunately, a large number of questions are not answered at all, which might hurt the quality or purpose of this community-oriented knowledge base. Up to 29% of Stack Overflow questions do not have any answers. There have been existing attempts in detecting the unanswered questions. Unfortunately, they primarily rely on the question attributes (e.g., score, view count) that are not available during the submission of a question. Detection of the potentially unanswered questions in advance during question submission could help one improve the question and thus receive the answers in time. In this paper, we compare unanswered and answered questions quantitatively and qualitatively by analyzing a total of 4.8 million questions from Stack Overflow. We find that topics discussed in the question, the experience of the question submitter, and readability of question texts could often determine whether a question would be answered or not. Our qualitative study also reveals several other non-trivial factors that not only explain (partially) why the questions remain unanswered but also guide the novice users to improve their questions. We develop four machine learning models to predict the unanswered questions during their submission. According to the experiments, our models predict the unanswered questions with a maximum of about 79% accuracy and significantly outperform the state-of-the-art prediction models.
堆栈溢出的早期检测和改进未解决问题的指南
Stack Overflow是最大和最流行的问答(Q&A)网站之一。它积累了数百万与编程相关的问题和答案,以支持开发人员进行软件开发。不幸的是,大量的问题根本没有得到回答,这可能会损害这个面向社区的知识库的质量或目的。多达29%的Stack Overflow问题没有任何答案。目前已经有尝试发现未解之谜。不幸的是,他们主要依赖于问题属性(例如,分数,浏览量),这些属性在提交问题时是不可用的。在提交问题的过程中,提前发现可能未解决的问题,可以帮助改进问题,从而及时收到答案。在本文中,我们通过分析来自Stack Overflow的总共480万个问题,定量和定性地比较了未回答和回答的问题。我们发现,问题中讨论的主题、问题提交者的经验以及问题文本的可读性往往可以决定一个问题是否会得到回答。我们的定性研究还揭示了其他一些重要的因素,这些因素不仅解释了(部分)为什么这些问题仍未得到解答,而且还指导新手用户改进他们的问题。我们开发了四个机器学习模型来预测提交过程中未解决的问题。根据实验,我们的模型预测未解问题的准确率最高约为79%,明显优于最先进的预测模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信