Where Was the “FEMA Guy” . . . in Washington, in New Orleans, Retired . . . ?

W. Waugh
{"title":"Where Was the “FEMA Guy” . . . in Washington, in New Orleans, Retired . . . ?","authors":"W. Waugh","doi":"10.1177/0095399709345456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dr. Birdsall’s account of his experience during the Katrina disaster is compelling and telling. The disaster had tremendous human costs and has encouraged a reevaluation of the nation’s approach to catastrophic disasters. Congress responded by passing the Post-Katrina Emergency Management Reform Act to help restore the federal government’s capabilities to deal with such events. However, important provisions of the Post-Katrina Reform Act were ignored by the Bush Administration. Critical functions were not restored. Even finding a professional emergency manager willing to accept the position of FEMA administrator was difficult given the poor support given the agency prior to Katrina and the lack of assurance that that situation would improve substantially in the aftermath. The agency is still being rebuilt. Where was the “FEMA guy”? The agency was understaffed, underfunded, and under the direction of officials who knew little about emergency management. Morale was low. Many experienced FEMA employees had already fled the agency (Waugh, 2007b, 2008). The “FEMA guy,” as Dr. Birdsall found out, was likely to be a volunteer firefighter. He or she might also have been a contractor from a large consulting firm hired to fill in. Interestingly, FEMA employees who had historically been permitted to volunteer for disaster operations when their regular duties were not deemed essential to the effort were not given clearance to deploy. FEMA issued calls for trained emergency responders and even Community Emergency Response Team (CERT) members. Temporary disaster assistance employees were activated as well. The lack of attention to natural hazards by Department of Homeland Security officials also had a negative impact on state and local emergency management agencies in terms of reduced funding for capacity building to deal with natural and technological disasters","PeriodicalId":153353,"journal":{"name":"Administration and Society","volume":"s3-2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administration and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399709345456","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Dr. Birdsall’s account of his experience during the Katrina disaster is compelling and telling. The disaster had tremendous human costs and has encouraged a reevaluation of the nation’s approach to catastrophic disasters. Congress responded by passing the Post-Katrina Emergency Management Reform Act to help restore the federal government’s capabilities to deal with such events. However, important provisions of the Post-Katrina Reform Act were ignored by the Bush Administration. Critical functions were not restored. Even finding a professional emergency manager willing to accept the position of FEMA administrator was difficult given the poor support given the agency prior to Katrina and the lack of assurance that that situation would improve substantially in the aftermath. The agency is still being rebuilt. Where was the “FEMA guy”? The agency was understaffed, underfunded, and under the direction of officials who knew little about emergency management. Morale was low. Many experienced FEMA employees had already fled the agency (Waugh, 2007b, 2008). The “FEMA guy,” as Dr. Birdsall found out, was likely to be a volunteer firefighter. He or she might also have been a contractor from a large consulting firm hired to fill in. Interestingly, FEMA employees who had historically been permitted to volunteer for disaster operations when their regular duties were not deemed essential to the effort were not given clearance to deploy. FEMA issued calls for trained emergency responders and even Community Emergency Response Team (CERT) members. Temporary disaster assistance employees were activated as well. The lack of attention to natural hazards by Department of Homeland Security officials also had a negative impact on state and local emergency management agencies in terms of reduced funding for capacity building to deal with natural and technological disasters
“联邦应急管理局的人”在哪里?在华盛顿,在新奥尔良,退休了……?
伯德索尔博士对他在卡特里娜飓风灾难中的经历的描述令人信服且发人深省。这场灾难造成了巨大的人员伤亡,并促使人们重新评估国家应对灾难性灾害的方法。为此,国会通过了《卡特里娜飓风后应急管理改革法案》,以帮助恢复联邦政府处理此类事件的能力。然而,布什政府忽视了卡特里娜飓风后改革法案的重要条款。关键功能未恢复。即使是找到一位愿意接受联邦应急管理署署长职位的专业应急管理人员也很困难,因为该机构在卡特里娜飓风之前得到的支持很少,而且无法保证这种情况在卡特里娜飓风之后会大幅改善。该机构仍在重建中。那个联邦应急管理局的人去哪了?该机构人手不足,资金不足,而且由对应急管理知之甚少的官员领导。士气低落。许多经验丰富的联邦应急管理局雇员已经逃离了该机构(Waugh, 2007b, 2008)。伯德索尔博士发现,这个“联邦应急管理局的家伙”很可能是一名志愿消防员。他或她也可能是从一家大型咨询公司雇来填补空缺的承包商。有趣的是,联邦应急管理局的雇员过去被允许自愿参加救灾行动,如果他们的日常职责被认为对救灾工作不重要的话,他们没有得到部署的许可。联邦应急管理局呼吁训练有素的应急响应人员,甚至是社区应急响应小组(CERT)成员。临时救灾人员也被激活。国土安全部官员对自然灾害缺乏关注也对州和地方应急管理机构产生了负面影响,减少了用于应对自然灾害和技术灾害的能力建设的资金
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信