{"title":"SOTERIOLOGI MENURUT PAULUS SEBAGAI DASAR TRADISI BAGI PELAKSANAAN PENDIDIKAN AGAMA DALAM KONTEKS PLURALISME DI INDONESIA","authors":"Demianus Nataniel","doi":"10.37368/ja.v3i1.45","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ronald H. Cram said “the radical dialogue is an appropriate religious education model in pluralism context”. He contended that the radical dialogue consists of the hospitality principles that goes beyond tolerance. Unfortunately, his argumentations have not been based on the biblical tradition. In this paper, therefore, I would like to propose soteriology of the cross in Paul’s letters as a supporting tenet for implementing the radical dialogue in religious education, especially in Indonesian pluralism context. Based on the principles of soteriology of the cross in Paul’s letters, Christian comunity in Indonesia will be provoked to implement the radical dialogue. In order to clarify how the principles of soteriology of the cross are approprieated with the concept of the radical dialogue, I will delineate an Indonesian pluralism context succintly and an appropriate model of religious education in the context respectively.","PeriodicalId":447909,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Abdiel: Khazanah Pemikiran Teologi, Pendidikan Agama Kristen, dan Musik Gereja","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Abdiel: Khazanah Pemikiran Teologi, Pendidikan Agama Kristen, dan Musik Gereja","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37368/ja.v3i1.45","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Ronald H. Cram said “the radical dialogue is an appropriate religious education model in pluralism context”. He contended that the radical dialogue consists of the hospitality principles that goes beyond tolerance. Unfortunately, his argumentations have not been based on the biblical tradition. In this paper, therefore, I would like to propose soteriology of the cross in Paul’s letters as a supporting tenet for implementing the radical dialogue in religious education, especially in Indonesian pluralism context. Based on the principles of soteriology of the cross in Paul’s letters, Christian comunity in Indonesia will be provoked to implement the radical dialogue. In order to clarify how the principles of soteriology of the cross are approprieated with the concept of the radical dialogue, I will delineate an Indonesian pluralism context succintly and an appropriate model of religious education in the context respectively.
罗纳德·h·克拉姆(Ronald H. Cram)说:“激进对话是多元主义背景下合适的宗教教育模式”。他主张,激进的对话包括超越宽容的好客原则。不幸的是,他的论证并非基于圣经传统。因此,在本文中,我想提出保罗书信中的十字架救赎论,作为在宗教教育中实施激进对话的支持原则,特别是在印度尼西亚多元主义背景下。基于保罗书信中十字架救恩论的原则,印尼的基督徒团体将被激发去实施激进的对话。为了阐明十字架救赎论的原则如何与激进对话的概念相适应,我将分别简要地描述印度尼西亚多元主义背景和宗教教育的适当模式。