'Sacrifice Zones' in the Green Energy Economy: Toward an Environmental Justice Framework

D. Scott, Adrian A. Smith
{"title":"'Sacrifice Zones' in the Green Energy Economy: Toward an Environmental Justice Framework","authors":"D. Scott, Adrian A. Smith","doi":"10.7202/1042776AR","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The environmental justice movement validates the grassroots struggles of residents of places which Steve Lerner refers to as “sacrifice zones”: low-income and racialized communities shouldering more than their fair share of environmental harms related to pollution, contamination, toxic waste, and heavy industry. On this account, disparities in wealth and power, often inscribed and re-inscribed through social processes of racialization, are understood to produce disparities in environmental burdens. Here, we attempt to understand how these dynamics are shifting in the green energy economy under settler colonial capitalism. We consider the possibility that the political economy of green energy contains its own sacrifice zones. Drawing on preliminary empirical research undertaken in southwestern Ontario in 2015, we document local resistance to renewable energy projects. Residents mounted campaigns against wind turbines based on suspected health effects and against solar farms based on arable land and food justice concerns, and in both cases, grounded their resistance in a generalized claim, which might be termed a “right to landscape”. We conclude that this resistance, contrary to typical framings which dismiss it as NIMBYism, has resonances with broader claims about environmental justice and may signal larger structural shifts worth devoting scholarly attention to. In the end, however, we do not wholly accept the sacrifice zone characterization of this resistance either, as our analysis reveals it to be far more complex and ambiguous than such a framing allows. But we maintain that taking this resistance seriously, rather than treating it as merely obstructionist to a transition away from fossil capitalism, reveals a counter-hegemonic potential at its core. There are seeds in this resistance with the power to push back on the deepening of capitalist relations that would otherwise be ushered in by an uncritical embrace of “green energy” enthusiasm.","PeriodicalId":234456,"journal":{"name":"Politics & Energy eJournal","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"40","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politics & Energy eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1042776AR","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 40

Abstract

The environmental justice movement validates the grassroots struggles of residents of places which Steve Lerner refers to as “sacrifice zones”: low-income and racialized communities shouldering more than their fair share of environmental harms related to pollution, contamination, toxic waste, and heavy industry. On this account, disparities in wealth and power, often inscribed and re-inscribed through social processes of racialization, are understood to produce disparities in environmental burdens. Here, we attempt to understand how these dynamics are shifting in the green energy economy under settler colonial capitalism. We consider the possibility that the political economy of green energy contains its own sacrifice zones. Drawing on preliminary empirical research undertaken in southwestern Ontario in 2015, we document local resistance to renewable energy projects. Residents mounted campaigns against wind turbines based on suspected health effects and against solar farms based on arable land and food justice concerns, and in both cases, grounded their resistance in a generalized claim, which might be termed a “right to landscape”. We conclude that this resistance, contrary to typical framings which dismiss it as NIMBYism, has resonances with broader claims about environmental justice and may signal larger structural shifts worth devoting scholarly attention to. In the end, however, we do not wholly accept the sacrifice zone characterization of this resistance either, as our analysis reveals it to be far more complex and ambiguous than such a framing allows. But we maintain that taking this resistance seriously, rather than treating it as merely obstructionist to a transition away from fossil capitalism, reveals a counter-hegemonic potential at its core. There are seeds in this resistance with the power to push back on the deepening of capitalist relations that would otherwise be ushered in by an uncritical embrace of “green energy” enthusiasm.
绿色能源经济中的“牺牲区”:迈向环境正义框架
环境正义运动证实了史蒂夫·勒纳(Steve Lerner)称之为“牺牲区”的地方居民的基层斗争:低收入和种族化的社区承担了与污染、污染、有毒废物和重工业有关的环境危害,超出了他们的公平份额。因此,财富和权力方面的差距,往往通过种族化的社会进程而不断出现和重新出现,被理解为造成环境负担方面的差距。在这里,我们试图理解这些动态是如何在移民殖民资本主义下的绿色能源经济中发生变化的。我们考虑到绿色能源的政治经济包含其自身牺牲区域的可能性。根据2015年在安大略省西南部进行的初步实证研究,我们记录了当地对可再生能源项目的抵制。居民们以怀疑对健康有影响为由,发起了反对风力涡轮机的运动,以可耕地和粮食正义为由,发起了反对太阳能农场的运动,在这两种情况下,他们的抵抗都是基于一种广义的主张,这种主张可以称为“景观权”。我们得出的结论是,与将其视为邻避主义的典型框架相反,这种抵制与更广泛的环境正义主张有共鸣,可能预示着值得投入学术关注的更大的结构转变。然而,最后,我们也不完全接受这种阻力的牺牲区特征,因为我们的分析表明,它比这种框架所允许的要复杂和模糊得多。但我们认为,认真对待这种抵制,而不是仅仅将其视为阻碍从化石资本主义过渡的障碍,揭示了其核心的反霸权潜力。在这种抵抗中,有一种种子,它有力量阻止资本主义关系的深化,否则,对“绿色能源”热情的不加批判的拥抱就会带来这种深化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信