THE CROSS-BORDER CAVITY OF THE INSOLVENCY & BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016

Mohit Kumar
{"title":"THE CROSS-BORDER CAVITY OF THE INSOLVENCY & BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016","authors":"Mohit Kumar","doi":"10.59126/v2i3a5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With globalization, there has been widespread international trade. In modern globalised world, a corporate is allowed to grow domestically and internationally. In case of Insolvency, the problem arises in international scenario and not at domestic level due to change in laws and jurisdiction. When a corporation crosses boundaries, the applicability of domestic law is out of scope and in that case the nations involved have to carve out the relevant law. The 2016 Insolvency and Bankruptcy Act (IBC), which offers a consolidated framework for the insolvency of companies, limited and unlimited liability partnerships, and individuals. But this cross-border aspect of insolvency law remains unclear in India as IBC does not properly deal with these issues. An attempt was made in this direction by inserting two provisions in IBC at last minute to resolve cross-border issues viz. “Agreement with foreign countries” and “Letter of Request to a country outside India in certain cases”, but these provisions proved out to be inadequate and of little assistance to institutions dealing with cross-border insolvency. The Insolvency Law Committee constituted by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, recently came out with recommendations on international insolvency. It has suggested implementing the 1997 UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency. This paper will outline the general principles of the UNCITRAL Model Law and analyse the difficulties of cross-border insolvency in the Indian context.","PeriodicalId":424180,"journal":{"name":"THE JOURNAL OF UNIQUE LAWS AND STUDENTS","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"THE JOURNAL OF UNIQUE LAWS AND STUDENTS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59126/v2i3a5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With globalization, there has been widespread international trade. In modern globalised world, a corporate is allowed to grow domestically and internationally. In case of Insolvency, the problem arises in international scenario and not at domestic level due to change in laws and jurisdiction. When a corporation crosses boundaries, the applicability of domestic law is out of scope and in that case the nations involved have to carve out the relevant law. The 2016 Insolvency and Bankruptcy Act (IBC), which offers a consolidated framework for the insolvency of companies, limited and unlimited liability partnerships, and individuals. But this cross-border aspect of insolvency law remains unclear in India as IBC does not properly deal with these issues. An attempt was made in this direction by inserting two provisions in IBC at last minute to resolve cross-border issues viz. “Agreement with foreign countries” and “Letter of Request to a country outside India in certain cases”, but these provisions proved out to be inadequate and of little assistance to institutions dealing with cross-border insolvency. The Insolvency Law Committee constituted by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, recently came out with recommendations on international insolvency. It has suggested implementing the 1997 UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency. This paper will outline the general principles of the UNCITRAL Model Law and analyse the difficulties of cross-border insolvency in the Indian context.
破产与破产法的跨境漏洞,2016年
随着全球化,出现了广泛的国际贸易。在现代全球化的世界里,企业可以在国内和国际上发展。在破产的情况下,由于法律和管辖权的变化,问题是在国际情况下产生的,而不是在国内一级。当一家公司跨越国界时,国内法的适用性就超出了范围,在这种情况下,有关国家必须制定相关法律。2016年《破产和破产法》(IBC)为公司、有限责任和无限责任合伙企业以及个人的破产提供了统一框架。但在印度,破产法的跨境方面仍然不清楚,因为IBC没有妥善处理这些问题。有人试图朝这个方向努力,在最后一刻在IBC中加入两项解决跨国界问题的条款,即“与外国的协议”和“在某些情况下向印度以外的国家提出请求的信函”,但这些条款证明是不充分的,对处理跨国界破产的机构几乎没有帮助。最近,由法人部组成的破产法委员会提出了有关国际破产的建议。它建议执行1997年《贸易法委员会跨国界破产示范法》。本文将概述《贸易法委员会示范法》的一般原则,并分析印度情况下跨境破产的困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信