The Ethical Challenges of Publishing Twitter Data for Research Dissemination

Helena Webb, M. Jirotka, B. Stahl, W. Housley, Adam Edwards, M. Williams, R. Procter, O. Rana, P. Burnap
{"title":"The Ethical Challenges of Publishing Twitter Data for Research Dissemination","authors":"Helena Webb, M. Jirotka, B. Stahl, W. Housley, Adam Edwards, M. Williams, R. Procter, O. Rana, P. Burnap","doi":"10.1145/3091478.3091489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Empirical research involving the analysis of Internet-based data raises a number of ethical challenges. One instance of this is the analysis of Twitter data, in particular when specific tweets are reproduced for the purposes of dissemination. Although Twitter is an open platform it is possible to question whether this provides a sufficient ethical justification to collect, analyse and reproduce tweets for the purposes of research or whether it is necessary to also undertake specific informed consent procedures. This paper reports on an ethics consultation that formed part of a wider research study and that aimed to identify best practice procedures for the publication of Twitter data in research findings. We focus largely on the UK context and draw on the outcomes of the consultation to highlight the range and depth of ethical issues that arise in this area. We can see Twitter as a case study for a wide number of data sources used in Web Science. This is a highly complex landscape in which questions crystallise around fundamental principles such as informed consent, anonymisation and the minimisation of harm. Furthermore, tensions exist between commercial, regulatory and academic practices, and there are also circumstances in which good ethical practice might compromise academic integrity. There is an absence of consensus in Web science and related fields over how to resolve these issues and we argue that constructive debate is necessary in order to take a proactive approach towards good practice.","PeriodicalId":165747,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Web Science Conference","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"53","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Web Science Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3091478.3091489","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 53

Abstract

Empirical research involving the analysis of Internet-based data raises a number of ethical challenges. One instance of this is the analysis of Twitter data, in particular when specific tweets are reproduced for the purposes of dissemination. Although Twitter is an open platform it is possible to question whether this provides a sufficient ethical justification to collect, analyse and reproduce tweets for the purposes of research or whether it is necessary to also undertake specific informed consent procedures. This paper reports on an ethics consultation that formed part of a wider research study and that aimed to identify best practice procedures for the publication of Twitter data in research findings. We focus largely on the UK context and draw on the outcomes of the consultation to highlight the range and depth of ethical issues that arise in this area. We can see Twitter as a case study for a wide number of data sources used in Web Science. This is a highly complex landscape in which questions crystallise around fundamental principles such as informed consent, anonymisation and the minimisation of harm. Furthermore, tensions exist between commercial, regulatory and academic practices, and there are also circumstances in which good ethical practice might compromise academic integrity. There is an absence of consensus in Web science and related fields over how to resolve these issues and we argue that constructive debate is necessary in order to take a proactive approach towards good practice.
发布Twitter数据用于研究传播的伦理挑战
涉及基于互联网的数据分析的实证研究提出了许多伦理挑战。这方面的一个例子是对Twitter数据的分析,特别是当为了传播目的而复制特定的tweet时。虽然Twitter是一个开放的平台,但人们可能会质疑,这是否为收集、分析和复制推文提供了足够的道德理由,以供研究之用,或者是否有必要采取具体的知情同意程序。本文报道了一项伦理咨询,该咨询是一项更广泛的研究的一部分,旨在确定在研究结果中发布Twitter数据的最佳实践程序。我们主要关注英国的情况,并利用咨询的结果来突出这一领域出现的道德问题的范围和深度。我们可以将Twitter视为Web科学中使用的大量数据源的案例研究。这是一个高度复杂的局面,其中的问题围绕着知情同意、匿名化和伤害最小化等基本原则而具体化。此外,商业、监管和学术实践之间存在着紧张关系,在某些情况下,良好的道德实践可能会损害学术诚信。关于如何解决这些问题,网络科学和相关领域缺乏共识,我们认为,为了采取积极主动的方法来实现良好的实践,有必要进行建设性的辩论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信