{"title":"Comparative Study of Flood Calculation Approaches, a Case Study of East Rapti River Basin, Nepal","authors":"K. Rijal","doi":"10.3126/HN.V15I0.11296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Various approaches to high flood calculation have been used to inform the design of hydraulic structures and flood protection works in Nepal. To assess potential flood volumes, a variety of methods and calculations are employed and the highest figure is adopted as correct so as to err on the side of safety. This approach, while safe, can result in excessively uneconomic design. As well, this approach erodes the designer’s confidence in the process to determine the potential flood volume and perpetuates such sub-optimal approaches. Through the case study of East Rapti River, this paper tries to shed light on various ungauged basin approaches of flood prediction currently in practice. It also compares the relative performance of those approaches using statistical methods and observed data. From the study, Jha PCJ method (1996) yielded a comparable result with the gauged basin methods. A remarkably notable fact obtained is that all the ungauged basin methods except rational method underestimated the flood discharge as compared to that obtained from the frequency analysis based on measured data sets. Overall, our study concludes that flood forecasting on ungauged basins cannot be recommended because a number of assumptions and personal judgments influence each of the prediction methods. Therefore, a more radical shift to basin specific intensive research is desirable DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/hn.v15i0.11296 HYDRO Nepal Journal Journal of Water, Energy and Environment Volume: 15, 2014, July Page: 60-64","PeriodicalId":117617,"journal":{"name":"Hydro Nepal: Journal of Water, Energy and Environment","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hydro Nepal: Journal of Water, Energy and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/HN.V15I0.11296","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
Abstract
Various approaches to high flood calculation have been used to inform the design of hydraulic structures and flood protection works in Nepal. To assess potential flood volumes, a variety of methods and calculations are employed and the highest figure is adopted as correct so as to err on the side of safety. This approach, while safe, can result in excessively uneconomic design. As well, this approach erodes the designer’s confidence in the process to determine the potential flood volume and perpetuates such sub-optimal approaches. Through the case study of East Rapti River, this paper tries to shed light on various ungauged basin approaches of flood prediction currently in practice. It also compares the relative performance of those approaches using statistical methods and observed data. From the study, Jha PCJ method (1996) yielded a comparable result with the gauged basin methods. A remarkably notable fact obtained is that all the ungauged basin methods except rational method underestimated the flood discharge as compared to that obtained from the frequency analysis based on measured data sets. Overall, our study concludes that flood forecasting on ungauged basins cannot be recommended because a number of assumptions and personal judgments influence each of the prediction methods. Therefore, a more radical shift to basin specific intensive research is desirable DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/hn.v15i0.11296 HYDRO Nepal Journal Journal of Water, Energy and Environment Volume: 15, 2014, July Page: 60-64
在尼泊尔,高洪水计算的各种方法已被用来为水利结构和防洪工程的设计提供信息。为了评估潜在的洪水量,我们采用了多种方法和计算方法,并采用最高的数字作为正确的数字,以免在安全方面犯错误。这种方法虽然安全,但可能导致过度不经济的设计。同时,这种方法也削弱了设计师在确定潜在洪水容量的过程中的信心,并使这种次优方法永久化。本文以东拉普提河为例,对目前实践中的各种流域洪水预测方法进行了探讨。它还比较了使用统计方法和观察数据的这些方法的相对性能。从这项研究中,Jha PCJ方法(1996)得出了与计量盆地方法相当的结果。一个值得注意的事实是,与基于实测数据集的频率分析结果相比,除合理方法外,所有未测量的流域方法都低估了洪水流量。总的来说,我们的研究得出结论,由于许多假设和个人判断影响了每种预测方法,因此不能推荐对未测量流域的洪水预测。因此,更彻底地转向针对流域的深入研究是可取的DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/hn.v15i0.11296 HYDRO Nepal Journal Journal of Water, Energy and Environment Volume: 15,2014, July Page: 60-64