Masculinity as a ‘hard small cage’? Reflections from Chimamanda Adichie’s We should all be feminists

G. Diabah
{"title":"Masculinity as a ‘hard small cage’? Reflections from Chimamanda Adichie’s We should all be feminists","authors":"G. Diabah","doi":"10.4314/ljh.v33i1.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With data from YouTube, this paper examines some masculinity issues raised by Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie in her TEDx talk ‘We should all be feminists’ and some selected interviews. She problematizes the masculine ideal of suppressing emotions and acting tough and uses them to gauge how masculinity can be described as a ‘cage’. To exemplify how this ‘cage’ might look like in reality, I draw on evidence from the literature on masculinity and men’s health as well as data from an unpublished document on discourses of fear and anxiety among male COVID-19 survivors in Ghana. Using the concept of hegemonic masculinity, I argue that the plethora of evidence in the literature suggest that (hegemonic) masculine norms indeed constrain men in ways that may have dire consequences, not only for their ego, but also for their health; hence, Chimamanda’s call to change the existing discourse is in order. Focusing on the ‘cage’ metaphor (including its qualifiers), however, I question Chimamanda’s description of masculinity since it suggests as though there is no room for contestation – something which weakens her own call for changing the narrative. The paper therefore proposes going beyond the kind of cage Chimamanda equates masculinity with, to make way for the needed interventions.","PeriodicalId":377973,"journal":{"name":"Legon Journal of the Humanities","volume":"82 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legon Journal of the Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/ljh.v33i1.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

With data from YouTube, this paper examines some masculinity issues raised by Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie in her TEDx talk ‘We should all be feminists’ and some selected interviews. She problematizes the masculine ideal of suppressing emotions and acting tough and uses them to gauge how masculinity can be described as a ‘cage’. To exemplify how this ‘cage’ might look like in reality, I draw on evidence from the literature on masculinity and men’s health as well as data from an unpublished document on discourses of fear and anxiety among male COVID-19 survivors in Ghana. Using the concept of hegemonic masculinity, I argue that the plethora of evidence in the literature suggest that (hegemonic) masculine norms indeed constrain men in ways that may have dire consequences, not only for their ego, but also for their health; hence, Chimamanda’s call to change the existing discourse is in order. Focusing on the ‘cage’ metaphor (including its qualifiers), however, I question Chimamanda’s description of masculinity since it suggests as though there is no room for contestation – something which weakens her own call for changing the narrative. The paper therefore proposes going beyond the kind of cage Chimamanda equates masculinity with, to make way for the needed interventions.
男子气概是一个“坚硬的小笼子”?来自Chimamanda Adichie的《我们都应该成为女权主义者》的思考
本文利用YouTube上的数据,研究了Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie在她的TEDx演讲“我们都应该是女权主义者”中提出的一些男子气概问题,以及一些精选的采访。她对压抑情绪和表现强硬的男性理想提出了质疑,并用它们来衡量男性气概如何被描述为“牢笼”。为了举例说明这个“笼子”在现实中可能是什么样子,我引用了有关男性气质和男性健康的文献中的证据,以及一份未发表的关于加纳男性COVID-19幸存者恐惧和焦虑话语的文件中的数据。利用霸权男子气概的概念,我认为,文献中的大量证据表明,(霸权的)男性规范确实以可能对男性产生可怕后果的方式约束男性,不仅对他们的自我,而且对他们的健康;因此,中国呼吁改变现有的话语是顺理成章的。然而,专注于“笼子”这个比喻(包括它的限定词),我质疑奇曼达对男子气概的描述,因为它似乎没有争论的余地——这削弱了她自己要求改变叙事的呼吁。因此,这篇论文建议,要超越Chimamanda等同于男性气概的那种牢笼,为必要的干预措施让路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信