A Hybrid Pricing Mechanism for Joint System Optimization and Social Acceptance

V. Reijnders, Marco E. T. Gerards, J. Hurink
{"title":"A Hybrid Pricing Mechanism for Joint System Optimization and Social Acceptance","authors":"V. Reijnders, Marco E. T. Gerards, J. Hurink","doi":"10.1109/ENERGYCon48941.2020.9236603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we propose a socially-accepted local electricity pricing mechanism for households that is dependent on the electric load of the neighbourhood and is able to flatten out the neighbourhood profile. The cost function used for this pricing mechanism is a piecewise linear approximation of a quadratic function.The motivation for using this mechanism is that the energy transition is expected to result in higher peak loads in electricity consumption as well as in renewable generation, which poses a significant challenge to the distribution grids. To tackle this problem, electricity consumption profiles need to be flattened.Following the literature, quadratic cost functions have proven their ability to achieve such a system optimization. However, their problem is that consumers find the resulting pricing mechanisms too complex and are generally unwilling to participate when offered these prices. In contrast, the social acceptance of simple pricing mechanisms such as currently used in practice is high, but these mechanisms are hardly giving any incentive to reduce peaks in electricity profiles.Based on the feedback of consumers participating in our field test and the criteria defined in the literature, we conclude that the proposed mechanism is socially accepted. Furthermore, a numerical evaluation shows that our proposed mechanism can flatten out peaks on the neighbourhood level, albeit that its convergence is slightly slower than by using the quadratic cost function. These two findings imply that the presented pricing mechanism has the potential to be useful in practice.","PeriodicalId":156687,"journal":{"name":"2020 6th IEEE International Energy Conference (ENERGYCon)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 6th IEEE International Energy Conference (ENERGYCon)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ENERGYCon48941.2020.9236603","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a socially-accepted local electricity pricing mechanism for households that is dependent on the electric load of the neighbourhood and is able to flatten out the neighbourhood profile. The cost function used for this pricing mechanism is a piecewise linear approximation of a quadratic function.The motivation for using this mechanism is that the energy transition is expected to result in higher peak loads in electricity consumption as well as in renewable generation, which poses a significant challenge to the distribution grids. To tackle this problem, electricity consumption profiles need to be flattened.Following the literature, quadratic cost functions have proven their ability to achieve such a system optimization. However, their problem is that consumers find the resulting pricing mechanisms too complex and are generally unwilling to participate when offered these prices. In contrast, the social acceptance of simple pricing mechanisms such as currently used in practice is high, but these mechanisms are hardly giving any incentive to reduce peaks in electricity profiles.Based on the feedback of consumers participating in our field test and the criteria defined in the literature, we conclude that the proposed mechanism is socially accepted. Furthermore, a numerical evaluation shows that our proposed mechanism can flatten out peaks on the neighbourhood level, albeit that its convergence is slightly slower than by using the quadratic cost function. These two findings imply that the presented pricing mechanism has the potential to be useful in practice.
联合制度优化与社会接受的混合定价机制
在本文中,我们提出了一种社会接受的家庭本地电价机制,该机制依赖于社区的电力负荷,并能够使社区概况变得平坦。用于这种定价机制的成本函数是二次函数的分段线性近似。采用这一机制的动机是,能源转型预计将导致电力消耗和可再生能源发电的峰值负荷增加,这对配电网构成了重大挑战。为了解决这个问题,电力消耗状况需要扁平化。根据文献,二次成本函数已经证明了它们实现这种系统优化的能力。然而,他们的问题是,消费者发现由此产生的定价机制过于复杂,并且在提供这些价格时通常不愿意参与。相比之下,社会对目前在实践中使用的简单定价机制的接受程度很高,但这些机制几乎没有任何激励措施来减少电力配置的峰值。根据参与我们实地测试的消费者的反馈和文献中定义的标准,我们得出结论,提出的机制是社会接受的。此外,数值评估表明,我们提出的机制可以在邻域水平上平坦化峰值,尽管其收敛速度略慢于使用二次代价函数。这两项发现表明,所提出的定价机制在实践中有可能是有用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信