Replication: Do We Snooze If We Can't Lose? Modelling Risk with Incentives in Habituation User Studies

Karoline Busse, Dominik Wermke, Sabrina Amft, S. Fahl, E. V. Zezschwitz, Matthew Smith
{"title":"Replication: Do We Snooze If We Can't Lose? Modelling Risk with Incentives in Habituation User Studies","authors":"Karoline Busse, Dominik Wermke, Sabrina Amft, S. Fahl, E. V. Zezschwitz, Matthew Smith","doi":"10.14722/usec.2019.23001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Users of computer systems are confronted with security dialogs on a regular basis. As demonstrated by previous research, frequent exposure to these dialogs may lead to habituation (i.e., users tend to ignore them). While these previous studies are vital to gaining insights into the human factor, important realworld aspects have been ignored; most notably, not adhering to security dialogs has barely had a negative impact for user study participants. To address this limitation, we replicate and extend previous work on the habituation effect. Our new study design introduces a monetary component in order to refine the study methodology on habituation research. To evaluate our approach, we conducted an online user study (n = 1236) and found a significant effect of monetary loss on the compliance to security dialogs. Overall, this paper contributes to a deeper understanding of the habituation effect in the context of warning dialogs and provides novel insights into the complexity of ecologically valid risk modeling in user studies.","PeriodicalId":215851,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings 2019 Workshop on Usable Security","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings 2019 Workshop on Usable Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14722/usec.2019.23001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Users of computer systems are confronted with security dialogs on a regular basis. As demonstrated by previous research, frequent exposure to these dialogs may lead to habituation (i.e., users tend to ignore them). While these previous studies are vital to gaining insights into the human factor, important realworld aspects have been ignored; most notably, not adhering to security dialogs has barely had a negative impact for user study participants. To address this limitation, we replicate and extend previous work on the habituation effect. Our new study design introduces a monetary component in order to refine the study methodology on habituation research. To evaluate our approach, we conducted an online user study (n = 1236) and found a significant effect of monetary loss on the compliance to security dialogs. Overall, this paper contributes to a deeper understanding of the habituation effect in the context of warning dialogs and provides novel insights into the complexity of ecologically valid risk modeling in user studies.
复制:如果输不了,我们会打盹吗?习惯化用户研究中带有激励的风险建模
计算机系统的用户经常会遇到安全对话框。正如之前的研究所表明的那样,频繁接触这些对话可能会导致习惯化(即用户倾向于忽略它们)。虽然这些先前的研究对于深入了解人为因素至关重要,但现实世界的重要方面却被忽视了;最值得注意的是,不遵守安全性对话框对用户研究参与者几乎没有负面影响。为了解决这一限制,我们复制并扩展了以前关于习惯效应的工作。我们的新研究设计引入了货币成分,以完善习惯化研究的研究方法。为了评估我们的方法,我们进行了一项在线用户研究(n = 1236),发现金钱损失对遵守安全对话的影响很大。总的来说,本文有助于更深入地理解警告对话背景下的习惯效应,并为用户研究中生态有效风险建模的复杂性提供了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信