Equality in the Information Age

William E. Kennard
{"title":"Equality in the Information Age","authors":"William E. Kennard","doi":"10.7551/mitpress/2419.003.0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Anatole France once observed \"the law, in its majestic equality, forbids all men to sleep under bridges ... the rich as well as the poor\" Such a stunted idea of equality neither served those who slept under bridges in the early twentieth century nor will it serve those children and communities stranded on the roadside of the Information Highway in the next century. Just as the railroads and interstates were the backbone of commerce, job growth, and prosperity in this century, the networks of information form the backbone of the next. We are enjoying the longest peacetime expansion of our economy, and this prosperity is directly linked to the rise of the information technology sector. Indeed, it is estimated that one-quarter of our economic growth has come from this sector of our economy. Yet the technologies, skills, and infrastructure underpinning this growth have not yet reached all Americans. There exists a \"digital divide,\" separating the technological haves and have-nots, dividing those with on-ramps onto the Information Highway from those forced to live in its shadows. This digital divide is defined not only by inequality in access to technology but also unequal access to opportunities to participate in the ownership and management of these vital companies. As technology restructures our economy for the Information Age, we must find ways to ensure that technology is a force that unites and uplifts us as a nation, rather than a force that divides. That is why I believe that the contributions in this issue of the Federal Communications Law Journal are so important and timely. I. ACCESS TO THE TOOLS OF LEARNING The issues discussed on the pages of this journal principally concern the lives of those not yet old enough to read it: children--the first citizens of the new millennium. The issue of access to new technology will also determine the steps of every worker on each rung of the socioeconomic ladder. It is clear that in the next century, those who are literate in computer languages and familiar with new technologies will succeed, and those who are not, will not. The high-skilled, well-paid jobs of tomorrow demand the ability to use computers and telecommunications. By next year, it is estimated that 60 percent of all jobs will require technical skills that most Americans do not have, and the workers in these jobs earn wages that are on average 10 to 15 percent more than those of other workers. In the New Economy, every child without access to the Internet and without technology skills inherits a lifetime of missed opportunity. Yet a lack of basic access to these technologies persists. Recently, the National Telecommunications and Information Administration at the Department of Commerce issued a report, entitled Falling Through the Net II, which found that many more people own computers and have access to online services than three years ago, but there is still disparity by race and income. For instance, the number of home PCs has increased by more than 50 percent since 1994, and the number of households using e-mail has nearly quadrupled. However, the study also found that families in households earning more than $75,000 a year were seven times more likely to own a computer than those in households earning $5,000 to $10,000. White households were twice as likely to own a computer as Black households. Other studies show that 78 percent of the schools in affluent communities have Internet access--but only half the schools in low-income areas have access. Children from low-income households and neighborhoods do not have Internet access at home or at school, and as many as three-quarters of Black high school and college students do not have a PC. Finally, in terms of their practical ability to get services, inner city areas are as technologically isolated as most parts of rural America. Clearly the digital divide is both a rural and an urban problem. To bridge this gap, Congress gave the Federal Communications Commission (FCC or Commission) an important way to ensure that all of America's children have access to the learning tools they will need in the Information Age. …","PeriodicalId":423100,"journal":{"name":"Federal Communications Law Journal","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"35","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Federal Communications Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/2419.003.0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 35

Abstract

Anatole France once observed "the law, in its majestic equality, forbids all men to sleep under bridges ... the rich as well as the poor" Such a stunted idea of equality neither served those who slept under bridges in the early twentieth century nor will it serve those children and communities stranded on the roadside of the Information Highway in the next century. Just as the railroads and interstates were the backbone of commerce, job growth, and prosperity in this century, the networks of information form the backbone of the next. We are enjoying the longest peacetime expansion of our economy, and this prosperity is directly linked to the rise of the information technology sector. Indeed, it is estimated that one-quarter of our economic growth has come from this sector of our economy. Yet the technologies, skills, and infrastructure underpinning this growth have not yet reached all Americans. There exists a "digital divide," separating the technological haves and have-nots, dividing those with on-ramps onto the Information Highway from those forced to live in its shadows. This digital divide is defined not only by inequality in access to technology but also unequal access to opportunities to participate in the ownership and management of these vital companies. As technology restructures our economy for the Information Age, we must find ways to ensure that technology is a force that unites and uplifts us as a nation, rather than a force that divides. That is why I believe that the contributions in this issue of the Federal Communications Law Journal are so important and timely. I. ACCESS TO THE TOOLS OF LEARNING The issues discussed on the pages of this journal principally concern the lives of those not yet old enough to read it: children--the first citizens of the new millennium. The issue of access to new technology will also determine the steps of every worker on each rung of the socioeconomic ladder. It is clear that in the next century, those who are literate in computer languages and familiar with new technologies will succeed, and those who are not, will not. The high-skilled, well-paid jobs of tomorrow demand the ability to use computers and telecommunications. By next year, it is estimated that 60 percent of all jobs will require technical skills that most Americans do not have, and the workers in these jobs earn wages that are on average 10 to 15 percent more than those of other workers. In the New Economy, every child without access to the Internet and without technology skills inherits a lifetime of missed opportunity. Yet a lack of basic access to these technologies persists. Recently, the National Telecommunications and Information Administration at the Department of Commerce issued a report, entitled Falling Through the Net II, which found that many more people own computers and have access to online services than three years ago, but there is still disparity by race and income. For instance, the number of home PCs has increased by more than 50 percent since 1994, and the number of households using e-mail has nearly quadrupled. However, the study also found that families in households earning more than $75,000 a year were seven times more likely to own a computer than those in households earning $5,000 to $10,000. White households were twice as likely to own a computer as Black households. Other studies show that 78 percent of the schools in affluent communities have Internet access--but only half the schools in low-income areas have access. Children from low-income households and neighborhoods do not have Internet access at home or at school, and as many as three-quarters of Black high school and college students do not have a PC. Finally, in terms of their practical ability to get services, inner city areas are as technologically isolated as most parts of rural America. Clearly the digital divide is both a rural and an urban problem. To bridge this gap, Congress gave the Federal Communications Commission (FCC or Commission) an important way to ensure that all of America's children have access to the learning tools they will need in the Information Age. …
信息时代的平等
阿纳托尔·弗朗斯曾经说过:“法律以其庄严的平等,禁止所有人睡在桥下……这种发育不良的平等观念既不能服务于20世纪初那些睡在桥下的人,也不能服务于下个世纪那些被困在信息高速公路路边的儿童和社区。正如铁路和州际公路是本世纪商业、就业增长和繁荣的支柱一样,信息网络将成为下一个世纪的支柱。我们正在享受和平时期最长的经济扩张,这种繁荣与信息技术部门的崛起直接相关。事实上,据估计,我国经济增长的四分之一来自这个经济部门。然而,支撑这一增长的技术、技能和基础设施尚未惠及所有美国人。“数字鸿沟”是存在的,它把有技术的人和没有技术的人分开,把那些有进入信息高速公路的人和那些被迫生活在信息高速公路阴影下的人分开。这种数字鸿沟不仅体现在获取技术的不平等,也体现在参与这些重要公司的所有权和管理的机会不平等。随着技术在信息时代重构我们的经济,我们必须设法确保技术成为团结和提升我们作为一个国家的力量,而不是分裂的力量。这就是为什么我认为本期《联邦通信法杂志》上的文章是如此重要和及时。一、获取学习工具本刊所讨论的问题主要关系到那些还没有大到能够阅读它的人的生活:儿童——新千年的第一批公民。获得新技术的问题也将决定每个工人在社会经济阶梯上的每个梯级。很明显,在下个世纪,那些精通计算机语言并熟悉新技术的人将会成功,而那些不熟悉的人将会失败。未来的高技能、高收入的工作需要会使用计算机和电信。据估计,到明年,60%的工作将需要大多数美国人不具备的技术技能,而从事这些工作的工人的工资平均比其他工人高出10%到15%。在新经济中,每一个无法上网和没有技术技能的孩子都将失去一生的机会。然而,仍然缺乏获得这些技术的基本途径。最近,商务部下属的国家电信和信息管理局发布了一份题为《坠网II》的报告,报告发现,与三年前相比,拥有电脑并能上网的人要多得多,但种族和收入之间仍然存在差距。例如,自1994年以来,家用个人电脑的数量增加了50%以上,使用电子邮件的家庭数量几乎翻了两番。然而,该研究还发现,年收入在7.5万美元以上的家庭拥有电脑的可能性是年收入在5000至1万美元家庭的7倍。白人家庭拥有电脑的可能性是黑人家庭的两倍。其他研究表明,富裕社区78%的学校可以上网,但低收入地区只有一半的学校可以上网。来自低收入家庭和社区的孩子在家或在学校都无法上网,多达四分之三的黑人高中生和大学生没有个人电脑。最后,就他们获得服务的实际能力而言,内城地区在技术上与美国大部分农村地区一样孤立。显然,数字鸿沟既是农村问题,也是城市问题。为了弥补这一差距,国会给了联邦通信委员会(FCC或委员会)一个重要的途径,以确保所有美国儿童都能获得他们在信息时代所需的学习工具。...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信