TOWARDS RE-IMAGINING INDUSTRIAL DESIGN EDUCATION FOR THE CONTEMPORARY PERIOD

Wil Dim, Ian de Vere, Jacob Sheahan
{"title":"TOWARDS RE-IMAGINING INDUSTRIAL DESIGN EDUCATION FOR THE CONTEMPORARY PERIOD","authors":"Wil Dim, Ian de Vere, Jacob Sheahan","doi":"10.35199/epde.2022.69","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is proposed that a progressive Industrial Design education should focus on supporting students in learning to self-manage ambiguity and bolster their agile independence throughout the tentative undergraduate years of growth [1]. As the field of Industrial Design moves beyond its industrial manufacturing roots, exploration of curricula that anticipates contemporary issues such as decolonisation, diverse participation and complexity in creative innovation is still not prevalent in this contemporary period [2]. Such a context necessitates an accelerated disruption to traditional design pedagogical practices [3], as seen in the RMIT University Industrial Design programme My First Six Months (MF6M) - a first-year learner-centred initiative situated around capacity development, student agency, self-efficacy, and disruption of expectations about the power dynamics in learning and teaching. This paper outlines the adoption of the RMIT University, My First 6 Months (MF6M) first-year learner-centred pedagogical alignment into the 2 nd and 3 rd year vertically integrated studio environment, through the case study ‘Safeness by Design (SbD)– Enabling an Ageing Workforce’ – a collaborative partnership with the Innovation Centre of WorkSafe Victoria, a state government safety regulatory body. In curating the studio’s outcomes, it became evident that the embedded predispositions developed throughout their MF6M experience, activated the diversity of students’ thinking and acting in situations resembling real-world design practice, which achieved our SbD studio’s pedagogical ambitions. We found this model to be highly transferable, requiring less teaching staff intervention and giving more flexibility to students, by reinforcing notions of independence, trust and self-efficacy in learning. Students are scaffolded as they dynamically explore and frame their own inquiry questions and continue developing their professional identity throughout their studies. In doing so, the classroom is firmly situated as a safe and democratic creative space, whereby teaching staff adopt a coaching role to establish a collaborative partnership, to further support student capacity and confidence.","PeriodicalId":147286,"journal":{"name":"DS 117: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (E&PDE 2022), London South Bank University in London, UK. 8th - 9th September 2022","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DS 117: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (E&PDE 2022), London South Bank University in London, UK. 8th - 9th September 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35199/epde.2022.69","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is proposed that a progressive Industrial Design education should focus on supporting students in learning to self-manage ambiguity and bolster their agile independence throughout the tentative undergraduate years of growth [1]. As the field of Industrial Design moves beyond its industrial manufacturing roots, exploration of curricula that anticipates contemporary issues such as decolonisation, diverse participation and complexity in creative innovation is still not prevalent in this contemporary period [2]. Such a context necessitates an accelerated disruption to traditional design pedagogical practices [3], as seen in the RMIT University Industrial Design programme My First Six Months (MF6M) - a first-year learner-centred initiative situated around capacity development, student agency, self-efficacy, and disruption of expectations about the power dynamics in learning and teaching. This paper outlines the adoption of the RMIT University, My First 6 Months (MF6M) first-year learner-centred pedagogical alignment into the 2 nd and 3 rd year vertically integrated studio environment, through the case study ‘Safeness by Design (SbD)– Enabling an Ageing Workforce’ – a collaborative partnership with the Innovation Centre of WorkSafe Victoria, a state government safety regulatory body. In curating the studio’s outcomes, it became evident that the embedded predispositions developed throughout their MF6M experience, activated the diversity of students’ thinking and acting in situations resembling real-world design practice, which achieved our SbD studio’s pedagogical ambitions. We found this model to be highly transferable, requiring less teaching staff intervention and giving more flexibility to students, by reinforcing notions of independence, trust and self-efficacy in learning. Students are scaffolded as they dynamically explore and frame their own inquiry questions and continue developing their professional identity throughout their studies. In doing so, the classroom is firmly situated as a safe and democratic creative space, whereby teaching staff adopt a coaching role to establish a collaborative partnership, to further support student capacity and confidence.
对当代工业设计教育的重新构想
有人建议,一个进步的工业设计教育应侧重于支持学生学习自我管理模糊性,并在整个初步的本科成长阶段加强他们的敏捷独立性[1]。随着工业设计领域超越其工业制造根源,对课程的探索,如非殖民化、多元化参与和创造性创新的复杂性等当代问题,在当代仍然不普遍[2]。这样的背景需要加速对传统设计教学实践的破坏[3],正如在RMIT大学工业设计项目“我的头六个月”(MF6M)中所看到的那样,这是一项以第一年学习者为中心的计划,围绕能力发展、学生代理、自我效能和对学习和教学中权力动态的期望的破坏。本文概述了RMIT大学通过与维多利亚州安全工作创新中心(一个州政府安全监管机构)合作的案例研究“设计安全(SbD) -实现老龄化劳动力”,将第一年以学习者为中心的教学方法调整为第二年和第三年垂直整合的工作室环境。在策划工作室的成果时,很明显,在他们的MF6M经历中发展的嵌入式倾向,激活了学生在类似于现实世界设计实践的情况下的思维和行动的多样性,这实现了我们SbD工作室的教学目标。我们发现这种模式是高度可转移的,需要更少的教学人员的干预,给学生更多的灵活性,通过强化学习中的独立、信任和自我效能的概念。学生是脚手架,因为他们动态地探索和框架自己的探究问题,并在整个学习中继续发展自己的职业身份。在这样做的过程中,教室被牢牢地定位为一个安全和民主的创意空间,在这里,教职员工采用教练的角色来建立合作伙伴关系,进一步支持学生的能力和信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信