External Validation Of 10 Points Intraoperative Gallbladder Scoring System (G10) In Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy at RSUPN dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo

Y. Mazni, W. Jeo, Rony Rony
{"title":"External Validation Of 10 Points Intraoperative Gallbladder Scoring System (G10) In Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy at RSUPN dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo","authors":"Y. Mazni, W. Jeo, Rony Rony","doi":"10.7454/nrjs.v5i2.1068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become a standard treatment for symptomatic cholecystolithiasis in dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital (RSCM). This study aims as a preliminary study to externally validate the 10-point intraoperative gallbladder scoring system (G10), an assessment system of laparoscopic cholecystectomy's difficulty. Method. A cross-sectional study was carried out. Enrolling subjects who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy from January 2019 to December 2019. Data of the subjects were collected from medical records. We assessed each of the subjects' G10 scores and operation techniques based on the intraoperative images and surgical reports. The surgical technique divided into two groups, those are the Critical View of Safety (CVS) technique and bailout procedure group, consisting of fundus–first cholecystectomy, subtotal cholecystectomy, and conversion. The correlation of G10 score between CVS and bailout was analysed using the Mann-Whitney nonparametric test. A Kendall's tau was performed to measure the correlation between the G10 score and the bailout procedure. Statistical power was calculated by Gpower application. A ROC test was performed to calculate the sensitivity and specificity of the G10 scoring system to predict bailout procedure, then the cut-off value was determined. Results. There was a significant and positive correlation between the G10 score with the bailout procedure (<0.001,+0.487). Testing the G10 score on the validation set yielded an AUROC=0.865 (<0.001), and the score >2 indicate subjects at high risk of bailout procedure (72.2% vs. 20.98%).. Conclusion: This study showed that the G10 score has good accuracy in predicting a bailout procedure. The use of G10 scores intraoperatively is \"essential\" to provide valid and objective assessment in determining the difficulty of surgery. When the G10 score is 1 or 2, it's safe to perform the CVS technique. Whereas, if the G10 score is three or greater, surgeon should consider bailout procedure.","PeriodicalId":305853,"journal":{"name":"The New Ropanasuri : Journal of Surgery","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The New Ropanasuri : Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7454/nrjs.v5i2.1068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become a standard treatment for symptomatic cholecystolithiasis in dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital (RSCM). This study aims as a preliminary study to externally validate the 10-point intraoperative gallbladder scoring system (G10), an assessment system of laparoscopic cholecystectomy's difficulty. Method. A cross-sectional study was carried out. Enrolling subjects who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy from January 2019 to December 2019. Data of the subjects were collected from medical records. We assessed each of the subjects' G10 scores and operation techniques based on the intraoperative images and surgical reports. The surgical technique divided into two groups, those are the Critical View of Safety (CVS) technique and bailout procedure group, consisting of fundus–first cholecystectomy, subtotal cholecystectomy, and conversion. The correlation of G10 score between CVS and bailout was analysed using the Mann-Whitney nonparametric test. A Kendall's tau was performed to measure the correlation between the G10 score and the bailout procedure. Statistical power was calculated by Gpower application. A ROC test was performed to calculate the sensitivity and specificity of the G10 scoring system to predict bailout procedure, then the cut-off value was determined. Results. There was a significant and positive correlation between the G10 score with the bailout procedure (<0.001,+0.487). Testing the G10 score on the validation set yielded an AUROC=0.865 (<0.001), and the score >2 indicate subjects at high risk of bailout procedure (72.2% vs. 20.98%).. Conclusion: This study showed that the G10 score has good accuracy in predicting a bailout procedure. The use of G10 scores intraoperatively is "essential" to provide valid and objective assessment in determining the difficulty of surgery. When the G10 score is 1 or 2, it's safe to perform the CVS technique. Whereas, if the G10 score is three or greater, surgeon should consider bailout procedure.
腹腔镜胆囊切除术中10分胆囊评分系统(G10)的外部验证
介绍。腹腔镜胆囊切除术已成为Cipto Mangunkusumo医院(RSCM)治疗症状性胆囊结石的标准治疗方法。本研究旨在对腹腔镜胆囊切除术难度评估系统术中胆囊评分系统(G10)进行初步的外部验证研究。方法。进行了一项横断面研究。纳入2019年1月至2019年12月接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术的受试者。研究对象的数据来源于医疗记录。我们根据术中图像和手术报告对每位受试者的G10评分和手术技术进行评估。手术技术分为两组,即安全批判观(CVS)技术组和救助手术组,包括底先胆囊切除术、胆囊次全切除术和转换术。采用Mann-Whitney非参数检验分析G10评分与救助的相关性。采用肯德尔τ来衡量G10得分与纾困程序之间的相关性。统计功率由Gpower应用程序计算。采用ROC检验计算G10评分系统预测救助程序的敏感性和特异性,并确定临界值。结果。G10得分与救助程序之间存在显著的正相关(2表示救助程序高风险的受试者(72.2%对20.98%)。结论:本研究表明,G10评分在预测救助程序方面具有良好的准确性。术中使用G10评分对于确定手术难度提供有效和客观的评估是“必要的”。当G10得分为1或2时,执行CVS技术是安全的。然而,如果G10得分在3分以上,外科医生应该考虑紧急救助手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信