Good set-points make good neighbors: user seating and temperature control in uberized workspaces

S. Nagarathinam, Arunchandar Vasan, V. Sarangan, Rajesh Jayaprakash, A. Sivasubramaniam
{"title":"Good set-points make good neighbors: user seating and temperature control in uberized workspaces","authors":"S. Nagarathinam, Arunchandar Vasan, V. Sarangan, Rajesh Jayaprakash, A. Sivasubramaniam","doi":"10.1145/3276774.3276781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"Uberized\" office spaces are becoming more common. In such co-working office spaces, occupants pay as they use for desks or cubicles. While uberization increases the economic utility of an office space, it can potentially conflict with a key goal of a smart office: personalized user comfort. In particular, an uberized smart office should handle users with conflicting thermal comfort preferences. Existing works have addressed either user comfort in spaces with hard partitions and single actuators or HVAC control to save energy in open spaces by detecting or predicting occupancy. We consider the decision problem of assigning users based on their comfort preferences to desks in an open-plan shared space without partitions. The problem is computationally challenging due to the assignment decision and the non-linearities in thermodynamic constraints. We use a thermal model to assign users to desks. We evaluate our approach in a real-world shared office setting through simulations. We find that our approach identifies the minimum energy configuration among those that maximize user comfort.","PeriodicalId":294697,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Systems for Built Environments","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Systems for Built Environments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3276774.3276781","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

"Uberized" office spaces are becoming more common. In such co-working office spaces, occupants pay as they use for desks or cubicles. While uberization increases the economic utility of an office space, it can potentially conflict with a key goal of a smart office: personalized user comfort. In particular, an uberized smart office should handle users with conflicting thermal comfort preferences. Existing works have addressed either user comfort in spaces with hard partitions and single actuators or HVAC control to save energy in open spaces by detecting or predicting occupancy. We consider the decision problem of assigning users based on their comfort preferences to desks in an open-plan shared space without partitions. The problem is computationally challenging due to the assignment decision and the non-linearities in thermodynamic constraints. We use a thermal model to assign users to desks. We evaluate our approach in a real-world shared office setting through simulations. We find that our approach identifies the minimum energy configuration among those that maximize user comfort.
好的设定值是好的邻居:用户座位和温度控制在优步工作空间
“优步化”的办公空间正变得越来越普遍。在这种共享办公空间中,占用者按使用办公桌或小隔间付费。虽然优步化提高了办公空间的经济效用,但它可能与智能办公室的一个关键目标相冲突:个性化的用户舒适度。特别是,一个超级智能办公室应该处理用户对热舒适偏好的冲突。现有的工作要么解决了用户在硬分区和单执行器空间中的舒适度,要么解决了通过检测或预测占用率来节省开放空间能源的暖通空调控制。我们考虑的决策问题是,在一个没有分区的开放式共享空间中,根据用户的舒适偏好分配他们的办公桌。由于分配决策和热力学约束的非线性,该问题在计算上具有挑战性。我们使用热模型来分配用户的办公桌。我们通过模拟在现实世界的共享办公环境中评估我们的方法。我们发现我们的方法确定了最大限度地提高用户舒适度的最小能源配置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信