{"title":"Conflict in corpora","authors":"Brian Clancy","doi":"10.1075/JLAC.00011.CLA","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The analysis of conflict in family discourse has often been characterised by ethnographic approaches and/or fine-grained analysis\n of unique conflict episodes. This article, by contrast, uses a c.175,000-word spoken corpus of Irish family discourse, in\n conjunction with a corpus pragmatic approach, to explore specific linguistic aspects of conflict discourse. Conflict episodes are\n identified and analysed in the corpus using a range of linguistic “hooks” (Rühlemann\n 2010) that have been previously associated with prefacing disagreement such as the marker well,\n mitigators (I think, I mean, I guess) or the counterargument strategy yes but. The analysis\n reveals that the family members most frequently use the yeah but strategy in conflict episodes which facilitates\n immediate disagreement. This strategy is often accompanied by a range of mitigators, predominantly in turn final position, some of\n which have not been previously identified as indexing conflict sequences.","PeriodicalId":324436,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/JLAC.00011.CLA","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The analysis of conflict in family discourse has often been characterised by ethnographic approaches and/or fine-grained analysis
of unique conflict episodes. This article, by contrast, uses a c.175,000-word spoken corpus of Irish family discourse, in
conjunction with a corpus pragmatic approach, to explore specific linguistic aspects of conflict discourse. Conflict episodes are
identified and analysed in the corpus using a range of linguistic “hooks” (Rühlemann
2010) that have been previously associated with prefacing disagreement such as the marker well,
mitigators (I think, I mean, I guess) or the counterargument strategy yes but. The analysis
reveals that the family members most frequently use the yeah but strategy in conflict episodes which facilitates
immediate disagreement. This strategy is often accompanied by a range of mitigators, predominantly in turn final position, some of
which have not been previously identified as indexing conflict sequences.