Conflict in corpora

Brian Clancy
{"title":"Conflict in corpora","authors":"Brian Clancy","doi":"10.1075/JLAC.00011.CLA","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The analysis of conflict in family discourse has often been characterised by ethnographic approaches and/or fine-grained analysis\n of unique conflict episodes. This article, by contrast, uses a c.175,000-word spoken corpus of Irish family discourse, in\n conjunction with a corpus pragmatic approach, to explore specific linguistic aspects of conflict discourse. Conflict episodes are\n identified and analysed in the corpus using a range of linguistic “hooks” (Rühlemann\n 2010) that have been previously associated with prefacing disagreement such as the marker well,\n mitigators (I think, I mean, I guess) or the counterargument strategy yes but. The analysis\n reveals that the family members most frequently use the yeah but strategy in conflict episodes which facilitates\n immediate disagreement. This strategy is often accompanied by a range of mitigators, predominantly in turn final position, some of\n which have not been previously identified as indexing conflict sequences.","PeriodicalId":324436,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/JLAC.00011.CLA","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The analysis of conflict in family discourse has often been characterised by ethnographic approaches and/or fine-grained analysis of unique conflict episodes. This article, by contrast, uses a c.175,000-word spoken corpus of Irish family discourse, in conjunction with a corpus pragmatic approach, to explore specific linguistic aspects of conflict discourse. Conflict episodes are identified and analysed in the corpus using a range of linguistic “hooks” (Rühlemann 2010) that have been previously associated with prefacing disagreement such as the marker well, mitigators (I think, I mean, I guess) or the counterargument strategy yes but. The analysis reveals that the family members most frequently use the yeah but strategy in conflict episodes which facilitates immediate disagreement. This strategy is often accompanied by a range of mitigators, predominantly in turn final position, some of which have not been previously identified as indexing conflict sequences.
语料库中的冲突
对家庭话语中的冲突的分析通常以民族志方法和/或对独特冲突事件的细粒度分析为特征。相比之下,本文使用约17.5万字的爱尔兰家庭语篇口语语料库,结合语料库语用学方法,探讨冲突语篇的具体语言方面。冲突事件在语料库中被识别和分析,使用一系列语言“钩子”(r hlemann 2010),这些“钩子”以前与歧见的开头有关,如标记好,缓解(我认为,我的意思是,我猜)或反论点策略,是的,但是。分析表明,家庭成员在冲突事件中最常使用“是的,但是”策略,这有助于立即产生分歧。该策略通常伴随着一系列缓解措施,主要是依次最终位置,其中一些先前未被确定为索引冲突序列。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信