Introduction to Ann Morning’s article “And you thought we had moved beyond all that: biological race returns to the social sciences”, 2014

Élodie Edwards-Grossi
{"title":"Introduction to Ann Morning’s article “And you thought we had moved beyond all that: biological race returns to the social sciences”, 2014","authors":"Élodie Edwards-Grossi","doi":"10.4000/urmis.2354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For many decades, sociologists have routinely drawn a line between productions in the social sciences that define race as a social construct and research findings in the natural sciences that use this same notion in order to describe genetically circumscribed groups. The latter publications are labeled essentialist, and are accused of promoting biological reductionism: they are viewed largely negatively by social scientists. Ann Morning’s various books and articles published after completing ...","PeriodicalId":119696,"journal":{"name":"Cahiers de l’Urmis","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cahiers de l’Urmis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4000/urmis.2354","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For many decades, sociologists have routinely drawn a line between productions in the social sciences that define race as a social construct and research findings in the natural sciences that use this same notion in order to describe genetically circumscribed groups. The latter publications are labeled essentialist, and are accused of promoting biological reductionism: they are viewed largely negatively by social scientists. Ann Morning’s various books and articles published after completing ...
2014年,安·莫宁(Ann Morning)的文章《你认为我们已经超越了这一切:生物种族回归社会科学》的引言
几十年来,社会学家经常在社会科学的研究成果和自然科学的研究成果之间划清界限,社会科学的研究成果将种族定义为一种社会结构,而自然科学的研究成果则使用同样的概念来描述受基因限制的群体。后者的出版物被贴上了本质主义的标签,并被指责为促进生物还原论:它们在很大程度上被社会科学家视为负面的。安·莫宁的各种书籍和文章出版后完成…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信