Conclusions

R. Lindsey, J. Mohan, Sarah L. Bulloch, E. Metcalfe
{"title":"Conclusions","authors":"R. Lindsey, J. Mohan, Sarah L. Bulloch, E. Metcalfe","doi":"10.1332/policypress/9781447324836.003.0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter reflects on the main findings of this book, and place these in a broader context by reflecting on their practical implications and relevance. A key issue is what the evidence tells us about whether voluntary action constitutes a genuinely renewable resource for social development, in a context of rising demand for it. The findings point to both challenges and opportunities. There is a strong and stable base of committed volunteers, and a majority of the adult population already engages to a significant degree (taking a broad definition of voluntary action, to include both formal and informal activities). An expansion of voluntary action is, however, challenging in the context of difficult economic circumstances faced by individuals, the growing need for care of elderly relatives as a result of pressures on the welfare system, and the reductions in public funding. Volunteers are not going to come forward simply in response to austerity measures. Persuading people to engage at all, or to a greater degree, requires a clear message about the intrinsic rewards of voluntary action and arrangements which enable people to fit voluntary action around their everyday lives. Essentially, this is about thinking about policy in a wider frame of reference than incentives and nudges towards pro-social behaviour. Instead, we might ask how economic policy and society might be managed to maximise opportunities for engagement.","PeriodicalId":199990,"journal":{"name":"Continuity and Change in Voluntary Action","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Continuity and Change in Voluntary Action","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781447324836.003.0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter reflects on the main findings of this book, and place these in a broader context by reflecting on their practical implications and relevance. A key issue is what the evidence tells us about whether voluntary action constitutes a genuinely renewable resource for social development, in a context of rising demand for it. The findings point to both challenges and opportunities. There is a strong and stable base of committed volunteers, and a majority of the adult population already engages to a significant degree (taking a broad definition of voluntary action, to include both formal and informal activities). An expansion of voluntary action is, however, challenging in the context of difficult economic circumstances faced by individuals, the growing need for care of elderly relatives as a result of pressures on the welfare system, and the reductions in public funding. Volunteers are not going to come forward simply in response to austerity measures. Persuading people to engage at all, or to a greater degree, requires a clear message about the intrinsic rewards of voluntary action and arrangements which enable people to fit voluntary action around their everyday lives. Essentially, this is about thinking about policy in a wider frame of reference than incentives and nudges towards pro-social behaviour. Instead, we might ask how economic policy and society might be managed to maximise opportunities for engagement.
结论
本章反映了本书的主要发现,并通过反映其实际意义和相关性,将这些发现置于更广泛的背景下。一个关键问题是,证据告诉我们,在对自愿行动的需求不断增加的背景下,自愿行动是否构成社会发展的真正可再生资源。研究结果既指出了挑战,也指出了机遇。有一个强大而稳定的志愿人员基础,大多数成年人口已经在很大程度上参与(对志愿行动进行广泛的定义,包括正式和非正式活动)。然而,在个人面临困难的经济情况、由于福利制度的压力而越来越需要照顾年长的亲属以及公共资金减少的情况下,扩大自愿行动是具有挑战性的。志愿者不会仅仅为了应对紧缩措施而挺身而出。说服人们参与,或者在更大程度上参与,需要一个明确的信息,即自愿行动的内在回报,以及使人们能够在日常生活中适应自愿行动的安排。从本质上讲,这是关于在更广泛的参考框架中思考政策,而不是鼓励和推动亲社会行为。相反,我们可能会问,如何管理经济政策和社会,使参与的机会最大化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信