GIS, SINKS, FILL, and disappearing wetlands: unintended consequences in algorithm development and use

D. Jenkins, L. McCauley
{"title":"GIS, SINKS, FILL, and disappearing wetlands: unintended consequences in algorithm development and use","authors":"D. Jenkins, L. McCauley","doi":"10.1145/1141277.1141342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Geographic Information Systems (GIS) software has become an important computational tool in several fields. GIS software ranges from command line processors, with maximal control over internal model decisions, to GUI versions with point-and-click access to pre-set modules. Based on the output from this software, some GIS users make important decisions to plan and manage landscapes (e.g., cities, parks, forests) with real consequences for the managed ecosystems. We discuss a programming decision in a GIS algorithm originally used to discern flow direction in hydrological modeling: a first step in mapping streams and rivers. Topographic depressions (\"sinks\") are \"filled\" in the algorithm to map water flow downstream; otherwise, the GIS algorithm cannot solve the flow direction. Unfortunately, sinks are often \"isolated\" wetlands which provide essential habitat for many species not commonly found elsewhere. Thus the algorithmic filling of sinks can make these wetlands \"disappear\" in GIS output and land-use decisions based on this output.This algorithmic detail may have potentially devastating real-world consequences for numerous wetlands because land-use plans made in ignorance cannot adequately conserve these unique habitats and the vital ecosystem services that wetlands provide. These consequences were not anticipated by the programmers who originally implemented the flow direction algorithm and may not be known to GIS users. We offer several strategies to reduce the impact of these consequences for GIS programmers, users, and policy makers who depend on GIS data when making decisions.","PeriodicalId":269830,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2006 ACM symposium on Applied computing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2006 ACM symposium on Applied computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1141277.1141342","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

Geographic Information Systems (GIS) software has become an important computational tool in several fields. GIS software ranges from command line processors, with maximal control over internal model decisions, to GUI versions with point-and-click access to pre-set modules. Based on the output from this software, some GIS users make important decisions to plan and manage landscapes (e.g., cities, parks, forests) with real consequences for the managed ecosystems. We discuss a programming decision in a GIS algorithm originally used to discern flow direction in hydrological modeling: a first step in mapping streams and rivers. Topographic depressions ("sinks") are "filled" in the algorithm to map water flow downstream; otherwise, the GIS algorithm cannot solve the flow direction. Unfortunately, sinks are often "isolated" wetlands which provide essential habitat for many species not commonly found elsewhere. Thus the algorithmic filling of sinks can make these wetlands "disappear" in GIS output and land-use decisions based on this output.This algorithmic detail may have potentially devastating real-world consequences for numerous wetlands because land-use plans made in ignorance cannot adequately conserve these unique habitats and the vital ecosystem services that wetlands provide. These consequences were not anticipated by the programmers who originally implemented the flow direction algorithm and may not be known to GIS users. We offer several strategies to reduce the impact of these consequences for GIS programmers, users, and policy makers who depend on GIS data when making decisions.
GIS,汇,填充和消失的湿地:算法开发和使用中的意外后果
地理信息系统(GIS)软件已成为许多领域的重要计算工具。GIS软件的范围从命令行处理器,最大限度地控制内部模型决策,到GUI版本,通过点击访问预先设置的模块。基于该软件的输出,一些GIS用户对规划和管理景观(如城市、公园、森林)做出重要决定,并对被管理的生态系统产生实际影响。我们讨论了最初用于水文建模中辨别水流方向的GIS算法中的编程决策:这是绘制溪流和河流的第一步。地形洼地(“水槽”)在算法中被“填充”,以绘制下游水流;否则,GIS算法无法求解流向。不幸的是,汇通常是“孤立的”湿地,为许多在其他地方不常见的物种提供必要的栖息地。因此,汇的算法填充可以使这些湿地在GIS输出和基于该输出的土地利用决策中“消失”。这种算法细节可能会对许多湿地造成潜在的破坏性现实后果,因为在无知的情况下制定的土地使用计划不能充分保护这些独特的栖息地和湿地提供的重要生态系统服务。这些结果是最初实现流向算法的程序员没有预料到的,GIS用户可能也不知道。我们提供了一些策略来减少这些后果对GIS程序员、用户和决策者的影响,他们在做决策时依赖GIS数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信