Dual crop coefficients and performance of evapotranspiration methods in irrigated wheat

T. D. Silva, William Fenner, Edna M. B. Silva, Thiago F. Duarte, Thiago Castañon, Luana Glaup Araujo Dourado, Maria Débora Loiola Bezerra
{"title":"Dual crop coefficients and performance of evapotranspiration methods in irrigated wheat","authors":"T. D. Silva, William Fenner, Edna M. B. Silva, Thiago F. Duarte, Thiago Castañon, Luana Glaup Araujo Dourado, Maria Débora Loiola Bezerra","doi":"10.21475/AJCS.21.15.01.2365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Water availability, fertilizer management and crop rotation are fundamental to the sustainability of agriculture and food security. Thus, the objective of this study was the determination of crops coefficients, verification and comparison of methods of estimation and determination of the evapotranspiration of irrigated wheat. The experiment was carried out during two consecutive years, in which BRS 254 varieties were cultivated in 2016 and BRS 394 in the year 2017. The evapotranspiration was estimated and determined using the dual kc methodology, FAO-56, with plants grown in 12 lysimeters filled with soil monoliths, and the loss of water by evaporation measured by weighing small-lysimeters. Evapotranspiration was also determined by the water balance method. The results measured in the lysimeters (standard method) were compared with the data simulated by the dual kc method and determined by method of soil water balance, in order to determine the accuracy and efficiency of the methods used. The coefficients used to determine the efficiency of the methods were the RMSE, the RSR and the confidence index \"c\". The total evapotranspiration of the crop in both years of cultivation was 360 mm, with mean values of 3.87 mm d-1 for cultivar BRS 254 and 4.10 mm d-1 for cultivar BRS 394. The basal crops coefficients in the emergence, tillering, flowering, maturation and harvest stages were 0.42, 0.78, 0.94, 0.74 and 0.47 for cultivar BRS 254 and 0.28, 0.27, 0.65, 0.98 and 0.66 for cultivar BRS 394. The soil water evaporation coefficients at the respective stages are 0.72, 0.52, 0.39, 0.58 and 0.13 for cultivar BRS 254 and 1.04, 0.96, 0.65, 0.34 and 0.51 for cultivar BRS 394. Ke represents on average about 47% of the evapotranspiration of the irrigated wheat crop. Between methods tested, lysimeter is the best to wheat transpiration followed by FAO method and soil water balance. The use of any methods should consider the objectives and resources availability.","PeriodicalId":436878,"journal":{"name":"January 2021","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"January 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21475/AJCS.21.15.01.2365","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Water availability, fertilizer management and crop rotation are fundamental to the sustainability of agriculture and food security. Thus, the objective of this study was the determination of crops coefficients, verification and comparison of methods of estimation and determination of the evapotranspiration of irrigated wheat. The experiment was carried out during two consecutive years, in which BRS 254 varieties were cultivated in 2016 and BRS 394 in the year 2017. The evapotranspiration was estimated and determined using the dual kc methodology, FAO-56, with plants grown in 12 lysimeters filled with soil monoliths, and the loss of water by evaporation measured by weighing small-lysimeters. Evapotranspiration was also determined by the water balance method. The results measured in the lysimeters (standard method) were compared with the data simulated by the dual kc method and determined by method of soil water balance, in order to determine the accuracy and efficiency of the methods used. The coefficients used to determine the efficiency of the methods were the RMSE, the RSR and the confidence index "c". The total evapotranspiration of the crop in both years of cultivation was 360 mm, with mean values of 3.87 mm d-1 for cultivar BRS 254 and 4.10 mm d-1 for cultivar BRS 394. The basal crops coefficients in the emergence, tillering, flowering, maturation and harvest stages were 0.42, 0.78, 0.94, 0.74 and 0.47 for cultivar BRS 254 and 0.28, 0.27, 0.65, 0.98 and 0.66 for cultivar BRS 394. The soil water evaporation coefficients at the respective stages are 0.72, 0.52, 0.39, 0.58 and 0.13 for cultivar BRS 254 and 1.04, 0.96, 0.65, 0.34 and 0.51 for cultivar BRS 394. Ke represents on average about 47% of the evapotranspiration of the irrigated wheat crop. Between methods tested, lysimeter is the best to wheat transpiration followed by FAO method and soil water balance. The use of any methods should consider the objectives and resources availability.
灌水小麦双作物系数及蒸散方法性能
水资源供应、肥料管理和作物轮作对农业的可持续性和粮食安全至关重要。因此,本研究的目的是确定作物系数,验证和比较灌溉小麦蒸散估算和测定方法。试验连续两年进行,2016年种植BRS 254, 2017年种植BRS 394。利用FAO-56双kc方法估算和确定蒸散量,将植物种植在12个装满土壤块状体的溶渗器中,并通过称重小型溶渗器测量蒸发损失。用水分平衡法测定了蒸散量。将溶解液计(标准方法)的测量结果与双kc法模拟的数据和土壤水分平衡法测定的结果进行比较,以确定所采用方法的准确性和效率。用于确定方法效率的系数是RMSE、RSR和置信指数c。2年作物总蒸散量为360 mm,其中BRS 254的平均值为3.87 mm d-1, BRS 394的平均值为4.10 mm d-1。BRS 254的出苗期、分蘖期、开花期、成熟期和收获期基础作物系数分别为0.42、0.78、0.94、0.74和0.47,BRS 394的基础作物系数分别为0.28、0.27、0.65、0.98和0.66。BRS 254各阶段土壤水分蒸发系数分别为0.72、0.52、0.39、0.58和0.13,BRS 394各阶段土壤水分蒸发系数分别为1.04、0.96、0.65、0.34和0.51。平均约占灌溉小麦作物蒸散量的47%。在试验方法中,蒸渗法对小麦蒸腾的测定效果最好,其次是FAO法和土壤水分平衡法。任何方法的使用都应考虑目标和资源的可用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信