Politik Hukum Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Pasca Perubahan Kedua Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011

Nadia Febriani, Ryan Muthiara Wasti
{"title":"Politik Hukum Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Pasca Perubahan Kedua Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011","authors":"Nadia Febriani, Ryan Muthiara Wasti","doi":"10.30656/ajudikasi.v7i1.6483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Article 22A of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia mandates the establishment of a rule regarding the law-making process, which serves as a guideline for the law-making process from its inception until the regulation is enacted to the public. However, in its implementation, problems are still related to the law-making process in Indonesia. This normative research uses a statutory and conceptual approach that specifically looks at \"over regulated\" or \"legal obesity” to analyze the legal politics of the formation of laws and regulations after the second amendment of Law Number 12 of 2011 concerning the Establishment of Laws and Regulations. In this context, there is an overlap between one law and another, which creates sectoral egos and results in legal uncertainty in its application. One of the causes of this legal obesity is the lack of regularity in the law-making process. In this case, legislators do not always refer to the guidelines for the law-making process and the principles for forming statutory regulations as stipulated in the law-making process regulation. In addition, the law still needs to be optimal in fulfilling meaningful participation. Therefore, the author will analyze the politics of law of the amendments of law-making process regulation after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020, which includes accommodating the omnibus method and the concept of meaningful community participation as a solution for overlapping legislation in Indonesia.","PeriodicalId":395461,"journal":{"name":"Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30656/ajudikasi.v7i1.6483","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Article 22A of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia mandates the establishment of a rule regarding the law-making process, which serves as a guideline for the law-making process from its inception until the regulation is enacted to the public. However, in its implementation, problems are still related to the law-making process in Indonesia. This normative research uses a statutory and conceptual approach that specifically looks at "over regulated" or "legal obesity” to analyze the legal politics of the formation of laws and regulations after the second amendment of Law Number 12 of 2011 concerning the Establishment of Laws and Regulations. In this context, there is an overlap between one law and another, which creates sectoral egos and results in legal uncertainty in its application. One of the causes of this legal obesity is the lack of regularity in the law-making process. In this case, legislators do not always refer to the guidelines for the law-making process and the principles for forming statutory regulations as stipulated in the law-making process regulation. In addition, the law still needs to be optimal in fulfilling meaningful participation. Therefore, the author will analyze the politics of law of the amendments of law-making process regulation after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020, which includes accommodating the omnibus method and the concept of meaningful community participation as a solution for overlapping legislation in Indonesia.
2011年第12条第2款修正案之后,政界立法确立了法律法规
1945年《印度尼西亚共和国宪法》第22A条规定,制定一项关于立法过程的规则,作为从立法开始到向公众颁布的立法过程的指导方针。然而,在执行过程中,问题仍然与印度尼西亚的立法过程有关。本规范性研究采用成文法和概念性的方法,具体着眼于“过度管制”或“法律肥胖”,分析2011年第12号法第二次修订后法律法规形成的法律政治。在这方面,一项法律与另一项法律之间存在重叠,这造成了部门的自负,并导致其适用的法律不确定性。造成这种法律肥胖的原因之一是立法过程缺乏规律性。在这种情况下,立法者并不总是参考立法过程规则中规定的立法指导方针和形成法规的原则。此外,法律在实现有意义的参与方面仍然需要达到最佳。因此,作者将分析宪法法院第91/PUU-XVIII/2020号判决后立法过程规定修正案的法律政治,其中包括将综合方法和有意义的社区参与概念作为印度尼西亚重叠立法的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信