Exploiting parsed corpora in grammar teaching

S. Wallis, I. Cushing, B. Aarts
{"title":"Exploiting parsed corpora in grammar teaching","authors":"S. Wallis, I. Cushing, B. Aarts","doi":"10.33011/lilt.v18i.1437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The principal barrier to the uptake of technologies in schools is not technological, but social and political. Teachers must be convinced of the pedagogical benefits of a particular curriculum before they will agree to learn the means to teach it. The teaching of formal grammar to first language students in schools is no exception to this rule. Over the last three decades, most schools in England have been legally required to teach grammatical subject knowledge, i.e. linguistic knowledge of grammar terms and structure, to children age five and upwards as part of the national curriculum in English. A mandatory set of curriculum specifications for England and Wales was published in 2014, and elsewhere similar requirements were imposed. However, few current English school teachers were taught grammar themselves, and the dominant view has long been in favour of ‘real books’ rather than the teaching of a formal grammar. English grammar teaching thus faces multiple challenges: to convince teachers of the value of grammar in their own teaching, to teach the teachers the knowledge they need, and to develop relevant resources to use in the classroom. Alongside subject knowledge, teachers need pedagogical knowledge – how to teach grammar effectively and how to integrate this teaching into other kinds of language learning. The paper introduces the Englicious1 web platform for schools, and summarises its development and impact since publication. Englicious draws data from the fully-parsed British Component of the International Corpus of English, ICE-GB. The corpus offers plentiful examples of genuine natural language, speech and writing, with context and potentially audio playback. However, corpus examples may be ageinappropriate or over-complex, and without grammar training, teachers are insufficiently equipped to use them. In the absence of grammatical knowledge among teachers, it is insufficient simply to give teachers and children access to a corpus. Whereas so-called ‘classroom concordancing’ approaches offer access to tools and encourage bottom-up learning, Englicious approaches the question of grammar teaching in a concept-driven, top-down way. It contains a modular series of professional development resources, lessons and exercises focused on each concept in turn, in which corpus examples are used extensively. Teachers must be able to discuss with a class why, for instance, work is a noun in a particular sentence, rather than merely report that it is. The paper describes the development of Englicious from secondary to primary, and outlines some of the practical challenges facing the design of this type of teaching resource. A key question, the ‘selection problem’, concerns how tools parameterise the selection of relevant examples for teaching purposes. Finally we discuss curricula for teaching teachers and the evaluation of the effectiveness of the intervention.","PeriodicalId":218122,"journal":{"name":"Linguistic Issues in Language Technology","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistic Issues in Language Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33011/lilt.v18i.1437","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The principal barrier to the uptake of technologies in schools is not technological, but social and political. Teachers must be convinced of the pedagogical benefits of a particular curriculum before they will agree to learn the means to teach it. The teaching of formal grammar to first language students in schools is no exception to this rule. Over the last three decades, most schools in England have been legally required to teach grammatical subject knowledge, i.e. linguistic knowledge of grammar terms and structure, to children age five and upwards as part of the national curriculum in English. A mandatory set of curriculum specifications for England and Wales was published in 2014, and elsewhere similar requirements were imposed. However, few current English school teachers were taught grammar themselves, and the dominant view has long been in favour of ‘real books’ rather than the teaching of a formal grammar. English grammar teaching thus faces multiple challenges: to convince teachers of the value of grammar in their own teaching, to teach the teachers the knowledge they need, and to develop relevant resources to use in the classroom. Alongside subject knowledge, teachers need pedagogical knowledge – how to teach grammar effectively and how to integrate this teaching into other kinds of language learning. The paper introduces the Englicious1 web platform for schools, and summarises its development and impact since publication. Englicious draws data from the fully-parsed British Component of the International Corpus of English, ICE-GB. The corpus offers plentiful examples of genuine natural language, speech and writing, with context and potentially audio playback. However, corpus examples may be ageinappropriate or over-complex, and without grammar training, teachers are insufficiently equipped to use them. In the absence of grammatical knowledge among teachers, it is insufficient simply to give teachers and children access to a corpus. Whereas so-called ‘classroom concordancing’ approaches offer access to tools and encourage bottom-up learning, Englicious approaches the question of grammar teaching in a concept-driven, top-down way. It contains a modular series of professional development resources, lessons and exercises focused on each concept in turn, in which corpus examples are used extensively. Teachers must be able to discuss with a class why, for instance, work is a noun in a particular sentence, rather than merely report that it is. The paper describes the development of Englicious from secondary to primary, and outlines some of the practical challenges facing the design of this type of teaching resource. A key question, the ‘selection problem’, concerns how tools parameterise the selection of relevant examples for teaching purposes. Finally we discuss curricula for teaching teachers and the evaluation of the effectiveness of the intervention.
解析语料库在语法教学中的应用
学校采用技术的主要障碍不是技术,而是社会和政治。在教师同意学习教学方法之前,他们必须确信某一特定课程的教学效益。在学校里向母语学生教授正式语法也不例外。在过去的三十年里,英国的大多数学校都被法律要求向五岁及以上的儿童教授语法主题知识,即语法术语和结构的语言知识,作为国家英语课程的一部分。2014年,英格兰和威尔士发布了一套强制性的课程规范,其他地方也实施了类似的要求。然而,现在很少有英语学校的老师是自己教语法的,而且主流的观点一直是支持“真正的书”而不是正式的语法教学。因此,英语语法教学面临着多重挑战:让教师相信语法在自己教学中的价值,向教师传授他们所需要的知识,并开发相关资源用于课堂教学。除了学科知识,教师还需要教学知识——如何有效地教授语法,以及如何将这种教学融入其他语言学习。本文介绍了englishous1学校网络平台,并对其发布以来的发展和影响进行了总结。englishicious从国际英语语料库(ICE-GB)的完全解析的英国部分提取数据。语料库提供了大量真实的自然语言、演讲和写作的例子,并带有上下文和潜在的音频回放。然而,语料库的例子可能是年龄不合适或过于复杂的,没有语法培训,教师没有足够的装备来使用它们。在教师缺乏语法知识的情况下,仅仅给教师和儿童提供语料库是不够的。所谓的“课堂协调”方法提供了工具,鼓励自下而上的学习,而english则以概念驱动、自上而下的方式解决语法教学问题。它包含一系列模块化的专业发展资源、课程和练习,重点放在每个概念上,其中广泛使用语料库示例。教师必须能够与学生讨论,例如,为什么work在一个特定的句子中是一个名词,而不仅仅是报告它是。本文描述了英语从中学到小学的发展,并概述了设计这类教学资源所面临的一些实际挑战。一个关键问题,“选择问题”,是关于工具如何参数化相关例子的选择,以达到教学目的。最后讨论了教师教学的课程设置和干预效果的评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信