The Paradox in the Political Economy of Land Grabbing in Africa as Medium of Exchange and Its Implication on States

Mukhtar Imam, Zakari Ismail Momoh
{"title":"The Paradox in the Political Economy of Land Grabbing in Africa as Medium of Exchange and Its Implication on States","authors":"Mukhtar Imam, Zakari Ismail Momoh","doi":"10.30845/aijss.v8n3p7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The foremost definition of the global land grab refers to acquisition of land in large scale – be it purchase or lease – for the purpose of agriculture etc. by foreign investors. The term has been extended to also cover transnational commercial land transactions and domestic deals and highlights the commercial nature of the transactions regardless of scale and output market. It is from the foregoing that this paper tries to make an analytical x-ray of the intricacies and controversies surrounding the issue of land grab and to also look closely at the dynamics of its medium of exchange as it pertains to foreign investors and local land owners in parts of Africa. The paper makes a practical indepth analysis of the issue from a pragmatic standpoint hence employing case studies. The paper relies largely on desk research but also adopts quantitative data gathered from field survey by other research institutions and individuals. The paper deduced that the political economy of land grab is largely detrimental to the host countries and the local populace at large and recommends amongst others that governments of local communities and states within Africa and other regions where this is prevalent must rise up to the occasion and secure the land of its people which is a great assert and is of significant importance due to its value. However genuine businesses in the form of foreign direct investment must be allowed to thrive as no country can survive in isolation without private sector involvement.","PeriodicalId":421989,"journal":{"name":"American International Journal of Social Science","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American International Journal of Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30845/aijss.v8n3p7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The foremost definition of the global land grab refers to acquisition of land in large scale – be it purchase or lease – for the purpose of agriculture etc. by foreign investors. The term has been extended to also cover transnational commercial land transactions and domestic deals and highlights the commercial nature of the transactions regardless of scale and output market. It is from the foregoing that this paper tries to make an analytical x-ray of the intricacies and controversies surrounding the issue of land grab and to also look closely at the dynamics of its medium of exchange as it pertains to foreign investors and local land owners in parts of Africa. The paper makes a practical indepth analysis of the issue from a pragmatic standpoint hence employing case studies. The paper relies largely on desk research but also adopts quantitative data gathered from field survey by other research institutions and individuals. The paper deduced that the political economy of land grab is largely detrimental to the host countries and the local populace at large and recommends amongst others that governments of local communities and states within Africa and other regions where this is prevalent must rise up to the occasion and secure the land of its people which is a great assert and is of significant importance due to its value. However genuine businesses in the form of foreign direct investment must be allowed to thrive as no country can survive in isolation without private sector involvement.
非洲土地掠夺作为交换媒介的政治经济学悖论及其对国家的影响
全球土地掠夺的首要定义是指外国投资者为农业等目的大规模购置土地--无论是购买还是租赁。这一术语也被扩展到包括跨国商业土地交易和国内交易,并强调了交易的商业性质,而不论其规模和产出市场。综上所述,本文试图对围绕 "土地掠夺 "问题的复杂性和争议进行分析,并仔细研究其交换媒介的动态,因为它涉及到非洲部分地区的外国投资者和当地土地所有者。本文从实用的角度对该问题进行了深入分析,因此采用了案例研究。本文主要依靠案头研究,但也采用了其他研究机构和个人从实地调查中收集的定量数据。论文推断出,抢夺土地的政治经济行为在很大程度上损害了东道国和当地广大民众的利益,并建议非洲和其他抢夺土地行为盛行的地区的地方社区和国家政府必须挺身而出,确保人民的土地安全,因为土地是一项重大主张,其价值十分重要。然而,必须允许外国直接投资形式的真正企业蓬勃发展,因为没有私营部门的参与,任何国家都不可能孤立地生存下去。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信