Evaluation of Utility Management Practice in Road Construction Projects of Mekelle City

Mearg Ngusse Sahle, Ashenafi Aregawi
{"title":"Evaluation of Utility Management Practice in Road Construction Projects of Mekelle City","authors":"Mearg Ngusse Sahle, Ashenafi Aregawi","doi":"10.11648/J.AJETM.20210604.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Poor installation, relocation, maintenance, and management of utilities in a road right-of-way causes; (a) project delays to ongoing road construction projects, (b) repetitive damage and service loss to utilities, and (c) frequent pavement cuts to roads after project completion. This research aimed to evaluate the telecommunication, electric power and water supply utilities management practice in Mekelle city, during the life cycle of road projects, with a special emphasis to the construction phase. The evaluation was made by using 14 project success criteria parameters to measure the performance of stakeholders according to the Ethiopian standards, and benchmarking the current practice with European & U.S.A best practices. Quantitative descriptive-survey approach followed by qualitative-case studies were used for the research. The quantitative data has been gathered using three different sets of questionnaires. Part I contained questions designed to study the pre-construction, and post-construction utility management practices. The respondents were road administrator, utility operators and urban planners. Part II and III of the questionnaire surveyed road designers and contractors for issues of utility management during road design and construction phases respectively. In order to confirm the responses from the questionnaire surveys, observations on 12 ongoing & 6 recently competed road projects, and desk study survey of 5 ongoing road projects were made. Then the root causes of utility management problems were identified using qualitative case studies on the capacity and limitations of individual stakeholders. Based on the data analysis it is concluded that, the current practice of utility management during a road project life cycle is very poor both according to the Ethiopian standards, and in comparison to the European and U.S.A. best practices. 98% of the ongoing road construction projects suffer impacts due to delay in relocating utilities; 43% of the contractors suffered frequent costs of utility damages; and 95% of the recently completed roads suffer from inadequacy of ROW, road-utility conflicts, and non-uniform utility installation practice. The root causes to the utility management problems are (1) inadequate or nonexistent standard guidelines, (2) lack of technology and knowledge for utility management, (3) absence of integrated infrastructure planning and development, and (4) absence of asset management program among the infrastructure planners and operators in Mekelle city.","PeriodicalId":287757,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Engineering and Technology Management","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Engineering and Technology Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.AJETM.20210604.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Poor installation, relocation, maintenance, and management of utilities in a road right-of-way causes; (a) project delays to ongoing road construction projects, (b) repetitive damage and service loss to utilities, and (c) frequent pavement cuts to roads after project completion. This research aimed to evaluate the telecommunication, electric power and water supply utilities management practice in Mekelle city, during the life cycle of road projects, with a special emphasis to the construction phase. The evaluation was made by using 14 project success criteria parameters to measure the performance of stakeholders according to the Ethiopian standards, and benchmarking the current practice with European & U.S.A best practices. Quantitative descriptive-survey approach followed by qualitative-case studies were used for the research. The quantitative data has been gathered using three different sets of questionnaires. Part I contained questions designed to study the pre-construction, and post-construction utility management practices. The respondents were road administrator, utility operators and urban planners. Part II and III of the questionnaire surveyed road designers and contractors for issues of utility management during road design and construction phases respectively. In order to confirm the responses from the questionnaire surveys, observations on 12 ongoing & 6 recently competed road projects, and desk study survey of 5 ongoing road projects were made. Then the root causes of utility management problems were identified using qualitative case studies on the capacity and limitations of individual stakeholders. Based on the data analysis it is concluded that, the current practice of utility management during a road project life cycle is very poor both according to the Ethiopian standards, and in comparison to the European and U.S.A. best practices. 98% of the ongoing road construction projects suffer impacts due to delay in relocating utilities; 43% of the contractors suffered frequent costs of utility damages; and 95% of the recently completed roads suffer from inadequacy of ROW, road-utility conflicts, and non-uniform utility installation practice. The root causes to the utility management problems are (1) inadequate or nonexistent standard guidelines, (2) lack of technology and knowledge for utility management, (3) absence of integrated infrastructure planning and development, and (4) absence of asset management program among the infrastructure planners and operators in Mekelle city.
梅克勒市道路建设项目公用事业管理实践评价
道路通行权内公用设施的安装、搬迁、维护和管理不善;(a)正在进行的道路建设项目的项目延误,(b)公用事业的重复损坏和服务损失,以及(c)项目完成后道路的路面频繁切割。本研究旨在评估梅克勒市在道路项目全生命周期内的电信、电力和供水公用事业管理实践,并特别强调建设阶段。评估是通过使用14个项目成功标准参数来根据埃塞俄比亚的标准衡量利益相关者的表现,并将当前的实践与欧洲和美国的最佳实践进行比较。本研究采用定量描述调查法和定性案例法。定量数据是通过三套不同的问卷收集的。第一部分包含了旨在研究施工前和施工后公用事业管理实践的问题。受访者包括道路管理者、公用事业运营商和城市规划者。问卷的第二部分和第三部分分别调查了道路设计师和承包商在道路设计和施工阶段的公用事业管理问题。为了确认问卷调查的结果,对12个正在进行和6个最近竞争的道路项目进行了观察,并对5个正在进行的道路项目进行了桌面研究调查。然后,通过对个体利益相关者的能力和局限性的定性案例研究,确定了公用事业管理问题的根本原因。根据数据分析,得出的结论是,根据埃塞俄比亚的标准,以及与欧洲和美国的最佳做法相比,目前道路项目生命周期内的公用事业管理实践非常差。98%正在进行的道路建设项目因公用设施搬迁延迟而受到影响;43%的承包商经常遭受公用事业损失的成本;95%的新建成道路存在ROW不足、道路公用设施冲突和公用设施安装不统一的问题。公用事业管理问题的根本原因是:(1)标准指南不充分或不存在;(2)缺乏公用事业管理的技术和知识;(3)缺乏综合基础设施规划和发展;(4)Mekelle市基础设施规划者和运营商缺乏资产管理计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信