A question of access: decentralized control and communication strategies for security policies

S. Ricker
{"title":"A question of access: decentralized control and communication strategies for security policies","authors":"S. Ricker","doi":"10.1109/WODES.2006.1678408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Chinese wall policy (CWP) is a security policy that governs the information that a group of agents may access. Information about competing companies is divided up into conflict sets. Agents adhering to CWP may only acquire information about one company per conflict set. Recently, a decentralized version of CWP was introduced, but its success was hampered by a limitation in the solution that had the potential to allow a clever agent to simultaneously access information about companies in the same conflict set, a clear violation of CWP. Using supervisory control theory, we investigate the synthesis of a decentralized CWP, where agents are not able to perform so-called \"double dipping\". In a control-theoretic approach, the behavior of the system and the specification are modeled as finite-state machines. A decentralized controller for CWP either allows or forbids access to information at each state of the system. These control decisions are based on (1) the specification; (2) local knowledge of an agent's previous requests to a given controller; and (3) knowledge communicated from other controllers regarding their own relevant local knowledge of that agent's previous requests","PeriodicalId":285315,"journal":{"name":"2006 8th International Workshop on Discrete Event Systems","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2006 8th International Workshop on Discrete Event Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WODES.2006.1678408","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The Chinese wall policy (CWP) is a security policy that governs the information that a group of agents may access. Information about competing companies is divided up into conflict sets. Agents adhering to CWP may only acquire information about one company per conflict set. Recently, a decentralized version of CWP was introduced, but its success was hampered by a limitation in the solution that had the potential to allow a clever agent to simultaneously access information about companies in the same conflict set, a clear violation of CWP. Using supervisory control theory, we investigate the synthesis of a decentralized CWP, where agents are not able to perform so-called "double dipping". In a control-theoretic approach, the behavior of the system and the specification are modeled as finite-state machines. A decentralized controller for CWP either allows or forbids access to information at each state of the system. These control decisions are based on (1) the specification; (2) local knowledge of an agent's previous requests to a given controller; and (3) knowledge communicated from other controllers regarding their own relevant local knowledge of that agent's previous requests
访问问题:安全策略的分散控制和通信策略
中文墙策略(CWP)是一种安全策略,用于管理一组代理可以访问的信息。关于竞争公司的信息被分成冲突集。遵循CWP的代理在每个冲突集只能获取一个公司的信息。最近,一个分散版本的CWP被引入,但它的成功受到了解决方案中的一个限制的阻碍,这个限制有可能允许一个聪明的代理同时访问同一冲突集中的公司信息,这显然违反了CWP。利用监督控制理论,我们研究了一个分散CWP的合成,其中智能体不能执行所谓的“双浸”。在控制理论方法中,系统的行为和规范被建模为有限状态机。CWP的去中心化控制器允许或禁止在系统的每个状态访问信息。这些控制决策基于(1)规范;(2)代理先前对给定控制器的请求的本地知识;(3)从其他控制人传达的关于他们自己对该代理先前请求的相关本地知识的知识
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信