Market Efficiency and Accounting Research: A Discussion of 'Capital Market Research in Accounting' by S.P. Kothari

Charles M. C. Lee
{"title":"Market Efficiency and Accounting Research: A Discussion of 'Capital Market Research in Accounting' by S.P. Kothari","authors":"Charles M. C. Lee","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.258495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Much of capital market research in accounting over the past 20 years has assumed that the price adjustment process to information is instantaneous and/or trivial. This basic assumption has had an enormous influence on the way we select research topics, design empirical tests, and interpret research findings. In this discussion, I argue that price discovery is a complex process, deserving of more attention. I highlight significant problems associated with a naive view of market efficiency, and advocate a more general model involving noise traders. Finally, I discuss the implications of recent evidence against market efficiency for future capital market research in accounting.","PeriodicalId":129325,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting & Economics (JAE) Conference Series","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"269","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting & Economics (JAE) Conference Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.258495","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 269

Abstract

Much of capital market research in accounting over the past 20 years has assumed that the price adjustment process to information is instantaneous and/or trivial. This basic assumption has had an enormous influence on the way we select research topics, design empirical tests, and interpret research findings. In this discussion, I argue that price discovery is a complex process, deserving of more attention. I highlight significant problems associated with a naive view of market efficiency, and advocate a more general model involving noise traders. Finally, I discuss the implications of recent evidence against market efficiency for future capital market research in accounting.
市场效率与会计研究:论S.P. Kothari的“会计中的资本市场研究”
在过去的20年里,许多资本市场的会计研究都假设,对信息的价格调整过程是即时的,或者微不足道的。这一基本假设对我们选择研究主题、设计实证测试和解释研究结果的方式产生了巨大的影响。在这个讨论中,我认为价格发现是一个复杂的过程,值得更多的关注。我强调了与天真的市场效率观点相关的重大问题,并主张采用一种涉及噪音交易者的更普遍的模型。最后,我讨论了最近反对市场效率的证据对未来资本市场会计研究的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信