Enforcing fairness in logistic regression algorithm

S. Radovanović, A. Petrović, Boris Delibasic, Milija Suknovic
{"title":"Enforcing fairness in logistic regression algorithm","authors":"S. Radovanović, A. Petrović, Boris Delibasic, Milija Suknovic","doi":"10.1109/INISTA49547.2020.9194676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Machine learning has been subject to discussion from the legal and ethical points of view in recent years. Automation of the decision-making process can lead to unethical acts with legal consequences. There are examples where the decision made by machine learning systems was unfairly biased toward some group of people. This is mainly because data used for model training were biased and thus developed a predictive model inherited that bias. Therefore, the process of learning a predictive model must be aware and account for the possible bias in the data. In this paper, we propose a modification of the logistic regression algorithm that adds one known and one novel fairness constraints into the process of model learning, thus forcing the predictive model not to create disparate impact and allow equal opportunity for every subpopulation. We demonstrate our model on real-world problems and show that a small reduction in predictive performance can yield a high improvement in disparate impact and equality of opportunity.","PeriodicalId":124632,"journal":{"name":"2020 International Conference on INnovations in Intelligent SysTems and Applications (INISTA)","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 International Conference on INnovations in Intelligent SysTems and Applications (INISTA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/INISTA49547.2020.9194676","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Machine learning has been subject to discussion from the legal and ethical points of view in recent years. Automation of the decision-making process can lead to unethical acts with legal consequences. There are examples where the decision made by machine learning systems was unfairly biased toward some group of people. This is mainly because data used for model training were biased and thus developed a predictive model inherited that bias. Therefore, the process of learning a predictive model must be aware and account for the possible bias in the data. In this paper, we propose a modification of the logistic regression algorithm that adds one known and one novel fairness constraints into the process of model learning, thus forcing the predictive model not to create disparate impact and allow equal opportunity for every subpopulation. We demonstrate our model on real-world problems and show that a small reduction in predictive performance can yield a high improvement in disparate impact and equality of opportunity.
逻辑回归算法公平性的实现
近年来,机器学习一直受到法律和伦理观点的讨论。决策过程的自动化可能导致不道德的行为,并产生法律后果。有一些例子表明,机器学习系统做出的决定对某些群体有不公平的偏见。这主要是因为用于模型训练的数据是有偏差的,因此开发的预测模型继承了这种偏差。因此,学习预测模型的过程必须意识到并考虑到数据中可能存在的偏差。在本文中,我们提出了对逻辑回归算法的改进,在模型学习过程中增加了一个已知的和一个新的公平约束,从而迫使预测模型不产生不同的影响,并允许每个子群体的机会均等。我们在现实世界的问题上展示了我们的模型,并表明预测性能的小幅降低可以在差别影响和机会平等方面产生很大的改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信