{"title":"Condensation risk: comparison of steady-state and transient methods","authors":"D. Mumovic, I. Ridley, T. Oreszczyn, M. Davies","doi":"10.1191/0143624406bse163oa","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accurate assessment of both surface and interstitial condensation risk is important not only to reduce the damaging effect of moisture within the structure of buildings, but also to provide a healthy environment free from mould growth. The current British Standard (BS EN ISO 13788: 2002) contains an assessment procedure based on the assumption of a steady-state heat flow through the building envelope, neglecting the transient nature of the problem. This paper compares and evaluates numerical results of the condensation risk calculation under both steady-state and transient conditions using the existing numerical codes. Significant differences are apparent between the predictions of the simple (steady-state) and complex (transient) methods for all construction details modelled. Practical application : The current British Standard (BS EN ISO 13788: 2002) gives calculation methods for determining the internal surface temperature of a building component or building element below which mould growth is likely, given the internal temperature and relative humidity–the method can also be used to assess the risk of other surface condensation problems. The calculation methods in the Standard are steady-state. The paper concludes that for cases where the steady-state method predicts that surface RH values will remain below the key value of 80%, a transient method can predict surface RH values to be above 80% for several hours. The practical implications of this work then are that transient calculation methods may be necessary under certain circumstances. This is particularly relevant given that the issue of a time period of a few hours is now more pertinent as it relates to a new transient performance standard in the new draft Approved Document F (Building Regulations–England and Wales).","PeriodicalId":272488,"journal":{"name":"Building Services Engineering Research and Technology","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Building Services Engineering Research and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1191/0143624406bse163oa","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20
Abstract
Accurate assessment of both surface and interstitial condensation risk is important not only to reduce the damaging effect of moisture within the structure of buildings, but also to provide a healthy environment free from mould growth. The current British Standard (BS EN ISO 13788: 2002) contains an assessment procedure based on the assumption of a steady-state heat flow through the building envelope, neglecting the transient nature of the problem. This paper compares and evaluates numerical results of the condensation risk calculation under both steady-state and transient conditions using the existing numerical codes. Significant differences are apparent between the predictions of the simple (steady-state) and complex (transient) methods for all construction details modelled. Practical application : The current British Standard (BS EN ISO 13788: 2002) gives calculation methods for determining the internal surface temperature of a building component or building element below which mould growth is likely, given the internal temperature and relative humidity–the method can also be used to assess the risk of other surface condensation problems. The calculation methods in the Standard are steady-state. The paper concludes that for cases where the steady-state method predicts that surface RH values will remain below the key value of 80%, a transient method can predict surface RH values to be above 80% for several hours. The practical implications of this work then are that transient calculation methods may be necessary under certain circumstances. This is particularly relevant given that the issue of a time period of a few hours is now more pertinent as it relates to a new transient performance standard in the new draft Approved Document F (Building Regulations–England and Wales).
准确评估表面和间隙冷凝风险不仅对减少建筑物结构内湿气的破坏性影响很重要,而且对提供一个没有霉菌生长的健康环境也很重要。现行的英国标准(BS EN ISO 13788: 2002)包含了一个基于假设通过建筑围护结构的稳态热流的评估程序,忽略了问题的瞬态性质。本文对现有数值规范在稳态和瞬态条件下的凝结危险计算结果进行了比较和评价。简单(稳态)和复杂(瞬态)方法对所有建筑细节建模的预测之间存在明显差异。实际应用:现行的英国标准(BS EN ISO 13788: 2002)给出了在给定内部温度和相对湿度的情况下,确定建筑构件或建筑构件的内部表面温度的计算方法,该方法也可用于评估其他表面冷凝问题的风险。标准中的计算方法是稳态的。本文得出结论,对于稳态法预测地表RH值将保持在80%以下的关键值的情况,瞬态法可以预测地表RH值在数小时内保持在80%以上。这项工作的实际意义是,在某些情况下,瞬态计算方法可能是必要的。考虑到几个小时的时间段问题现在更加相关,因为它涉及到新的批准文件草案F(建筑法规-英格兰和威尔士)中的新的暂态性能标准,这一点尤其相关。