Certain issues of qualifying petty theft committed repeatedly (article 7.27 of the Code of Administrative offenses of the Russian federation and article 158.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation)

K. Smirnova
{"title":"Certain issues of qualifying petty theft committed repeatedly (article 7.27 of the Code of Administrative offenses of the Russian federation and article 158.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation)","authors":"K. Smirnova","doi":"10.26516/2071-8136.2022.2.33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on a comprehensive analysis of the norms provided for by Art. 7.27 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation and Art. 158.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, it was concluded that the legal regulation of liability for petty theft contains a number of fundamental theoretical errors. In particular, it is noted that the legislator, in the interests of preventing crimes against property, ignores the social danger of acts. It is concluded that the basis of criminal liability, contrary to the requirements of Part 1 of Art. 1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation is specified in the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation. Objective signs of petty theft are subjected to a detailed analysis. Measures are proposed to optimize the legal regulation of liability for petty theft committed repeatedly.","PeriodicalId":126097,"journal":{"name":"Siberian Law Herald","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Siberian Law Herald","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26516/2071-8136.2022.2.33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Based on a comprehensive analysis of the norms provided for by Art. 7.27 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation and Art. 158.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, it was concluded that the legal regulation of liability for petty theft contains a number of fundamental theoretical errors. In particular, it is noted that the legislator, in the interests of preventing crimes against property, ignores the social danger of acts. It is concluded that the basis of criminal liability, contrary to the requirements of Part 1 of Art. 1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation is specified in the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation. Objective signs of petty theft are subjected to a detailed analysis. Measures are proposed to optimize the legal regulation of liability for petty theft committed repeatedly.
多次小偷小盗行为的某些合格问题(俄罗斯联邦行政犯罪法第7.27条和俄罗斯联邦刑法第158.1条)
根据对《俄罗斯联邦行政犯罪法》第7.27条和《俄罗斯联邦刑法典》第158.1条规定的规范的全面分析,得出的结论是,关于小偷小盗责任的法律规定包含一些基本的理论错误。特别要指出的是,立法者为了防止财产犯罪而忽视了行为的社会危险性。结论是,与《俄罗斯联邦刑法典》第1条第1部分的要求相反,刑事责任的基础是在《俄罗斯联邦行政犯罪法》中规定的。小偷小摸的客观迹象要经过详细的分析。提出了优化重复小偷小摸责任法律规制的措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信