Convergence and harmonization of standards organizations

Karl F. Best
{"title":"Convergence and harmonization of standards organizations","authors":"Karl F. Best","doi":"10.1109/SIIT.2007.4629321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accredited and non-accredited standards organizations, commonly referred to as ldquoSDOsrdquo and ldquoSSOsrdquo respectively, are more alike than usually thought. Both rely on volunteers to provide their time and effort and to apply their domain expertise to create industry, national, and international standards. Both face similar challenges with regards to IPR issues, governance, business models, membership recruitment and retention, and promotion of work products. Accreditation by itself is not a valid distinguishing feature; many unaccredited organizations are fully qualified to become accredited and would do so if only they saw the need or benefit. The perceived differences between these types of organizations, while loosely based on historical practices, depend mostly upon whom one asks. In addition, the two types of organizations are becoming more like each other as their practices become more closely aligned and as they reach out to work with each other, recognizing the value of each otherspsila efforts.","PeriodicalId":126469,"journal":{"name":"2007 5th International Conference on Standardization and Innovation in Information Technology","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2007 5th International Conference on Standardization and Innovation in Information Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIIT.2007.4629321","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Accredited and non-accredited standards organizations, commonly referred to as ldquoSDOsrdquo and ldquoSSOsrdquo respectively, are more alike than usually thought. Both rely on volunteers to provide their time and effort and to apply their domain expertise to create industry, national, and international standards. Both face similar challenges with regards to IPR issues, governance, business models, membership recruitment and retention, and promotion of work products. Accreditation by itself is not a valid distinguishing feature; many unaccredited organizations are fully qualified to become accredited and would do so if only they saw the need or benefit. The perceived differences between these types of organizations, while loosely based on historical practices, depend mostly upon whom one asks. In addition, the two types of organizations are becoming more like each other as their practices become more closely aligned and as they reach out to work with each other, recognizing the value of each otherspsila efforts.
统一和协调标准组织
认可和非认可的标准组织(通常分别称为ldquosossrdquo和ldquosossrdquo)比通常认为的更相似。两者都依赖志愿者提供他们的时间和精力,并运用他们的领域专业知识来创建行业、国家和国际标准。在知识产权问题、治理、商业模式、成员招募和保留以及工作产品的推广方面,两者都面临着类似的挑战。认证本身不是有效的特征;许多未经认证的组织完全有资格获得认证,只要他们看到需要或利益,他们就会这样做。这些类型的组织之间的感知差异,虽然松散地基于历史实践,但主要取决于你问的是谁。此外,这两种类型的组织变得越来越像彼此,因为他们的实践变得更加紧密地结合在一起,因为他们接触到彼此的工作,认识到彼此努力的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信