{"title":"Un Duel Manqué en 1927: Les Surréalistes, Jean Paulhan et la NRF Surréalistes","authors":"Claude-Pierre Pérez","doi":"10.1080/17496977.2003.11417751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On 1st October 1927, Jean Paulhan, Editor-inChief of La Nouvelle Revue Franfaise published two reviews. One concerned Au Grand Jour, a joint pamphlet published a short while before by the Editions surrealistes, and which focused on the relationships between surrealists and communists. The second dealt with the reply by Antonin Artaud, who had recently been excluded from the surrealist group and who had been insulted in the pamphlet. Artaud's reply was entitled A Ia Grande Nuit. A short while after, Paulhan received a blunt letter from Breton. He immediately chose two witnesses, but when they showed up at the offender's house, Breton refused to fight. Paulhan then published the note with which his witnesses had informed him of Breton's refusal. Also published was his own conclusion: 'One now knows the cowardice that lies beneath the violence and filth of that person'. Beyond its picturesque quality, this episode is not unworthy of the attention of an audience preoccupied by quarrels affecting the intellectual world, their changing forms and the way they shed light on power plays that are usually better concealed. Paulhan's attitude, in 1927, was not as uncommon as one today might imagine. Literary duels were practised in France before the Great War. After the armistice, they did survive, after a fashion, as harmless human comedies.","PeriodicalId":360014,"journal":{"name":"Intellectual News","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intellectual News","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17496977.2003.11417751","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
On 1st October 1927, Jean Paulhan, Editor-inChief of La Nouvelle Revue Franfaise published two reviews. One concerned Au Grand Jour, a joint pamphlet published a short while before by the Editions surrealistes, and which focused on the relationships between surrealists and communists. The second dealt with the reply by Antonin Artaud, who had recently been excluded from the surrealist group and who had been insulted in the pamphlet. Artaud's reply was entitled A Ia Grande Nuit. A short while after, Paulhan received a blunt letter from Breton. He immediately chose two witnesses, but when they showed up at the offender's house, Breton refused to fight. Paulhan then published the note with which his witnesses had informed him of Breton's refusal. Also published was his own conclusion: 'One now knows the cowardice that lies beneath the violence and filth of that person'. Beyond its picturesque quality, this episode is not unworthy of the attention of an audience preoccupied by quarrels affecting the intellectual world, their changing forms and the way they shed light on power plays that are usually better concealed. Paulhan's attitude, in 1927, was not as uncommon as one today might imagine. Literary duels were practised in France before the Great War. After the armistice, they did survive, after a fashion, as harmless human comedies.
1927年10月1日,《法国新评论》的主编让·保尔汉发表了两篇评论。其中一本是关于《伟大的一天》(Au Grand Jour)的,这是超现实主义出版社(Editions超现实主义)不久前出版的一本联合小册子,关注的是超现实主义者和共产主义者之间的关系。第二封是关于安东宁·阿尔托(Antonin Artaud)的回复,他最近被排除在超现实主义团体之外,并在小册子中受到了侮辱。亚陶的回信的标题是“A Ia Grande Nuit”。不久之后,波罕收到了一封来自布列塔尼的直率的信。他立即选择了两名证人,但当他们出现在罪犯的家中时,布列塔尼拒绝反抗。于是,保翰把他的证人告诉他布列塔尼拒绝他的那封信发表了出来。他还发表了自己的结论:“人们现在知道了那个人的暴力和肮脏背后隐藏着的懦弱。”除了风景如画之外,这一集也并非不值得观众的关注,因为他们正全神贯注于影响知识界的争吵,它们不断变化的形式,以及它们揭示通常被更好地掩盖的权力游戏的方式。1927年,保尔汉的态度并不像今天人们想象的那么罕见。在第一次世界大战之前,法国就有文学决斗的习俗。停战后,它们确实以无害的人类喜剧的形式幸存了下来。