The Apotheosis of Apotheosis: Levinas’s On Escape, Hegel’s Unhappy Consciousness, and Us

Epoch Pub Date : 2007-04-01 DOI:10.5840/EPOCHE200712111
C. Fox
{"title":"The Apotheosis of Apotheosis: Levinas’s On Escape, Hegel’s Unhappy Consciousness, and Us","authors":"C. Fox","doi":"10.5840/EPOCHE200712111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The recent translation of Emmanuel Levinas's essay On Escape complicates our view of his relationship to Hegel, and reopens the ontological question of escape. The impetus for Levinas's essay was National Socialism's effort to reduce subjectivity to being qua biologistic. To resist this, Levinas enlists idealism as an ally. He affirms the idealist subject's effort to escape being, but denies that it makes good its escape. I challenge this denial by comparing Levinas's phenomenology of escape with Hegel's phenomenology of unhappy consciousness, paying special attention to the themes of shame and the will to escape. The similarity between treatments leads me to suggest that the urge to escape emerges at least as early as medieval Christianity, thus predating the historical predicament of mid- 1930s European Jewry. I conclude by interpreting space travel and the posthuman figure of the cyborg as signs that escape continues as an object of human aspiration.","PeriodicalId":202733,"journal":{"name":"Epoch","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epoch","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/EPOCHE200712111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The recent translation of Emmanuel Levinas's essay On Escape complicates our view of his relationship to Hegel, and reopens the ontological question of escape. The impetus for Levinas's essay was National Socialism's effort to reduce subjectivity to being qua biologistic. To resist this, Levinas enlists idealism as an ally. He affirms the idealist subject's effort to escape being, but denies that it makes good its escape. I challenge this denial by comparing Levinas's phenomenology of escape with Hegel's phenomenology of unhappy consciousness, paying special attention to the themes of shame and the will to escape. The similarity between treatments leads me to suggest that the urge to escape emerges at least as early as medieval Christianity, thus predating the historical predicament of mid- 1930s European Jewry. I conclude by interpreting space travel and the posthuman figure of the cyborg as signs that escape continues as an object of human aspiration.
神化的神化:列维纳斯的《逃避论》、黑格尔的《不幸意识》和《我们》
伊曼纽尔·列维纳斯(Emmanuel Levinas)的文章《论逃避》(On Escape)最近的翻译使我们对他与黑格尔关系的看法变得复杂,并重新开启了逃避的本体论问题。列维纳斯这篇文章的推动力是国家社会主义试图将主体性降低到生物学的程度。为了抵制这一点,列维纳斯将理想主义作为盟友。他肯定了唯心主义主体逃避存在的努力,但否认唯心主义主体使其逃避成为现实。我通过比较列维纳斯的逃跑现象学和黑格尔的不幸意识现象学来挑战这种否定,特别关注羞耻和逃跑意志的主题。两种治疗方法的相似性使我认为,逃避的冲动至少早在中世纪基督教时期就出现了,因此早于20世纪30年代中期欧洲犹太人的历史困境。最后,我将太空旅行和后人类的半机械人形象解释为逃逸继续作为人类渴望的目标的标志。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信