{"title":"A disjoint route-sets approach to design of path-protecting p-cycle networks","authors":"A. Kodian, W. Grover, J. Doucette","doi":"10.1109/DRCN.2005.1563871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent work has proposed the concept of failure-independent path-protecting (FIPP) p-cycles as a pre-connected, failure independent, path-protecting network architecture [A. Kodian, W. D. Grover (2005)]. FIPP p-cycles extend p-cycles by adding the property, like shared backup path protection (SBPP), of providing end-to-end failure independent path switching against either span or node failures. Especially in a transparent or translucent optical network, the property of pre-cross-connection of protection paths can be even more important than just increasing restoration-speed: when optical protection paths are pre-cross-connected, they can be guaranteed in advance to work when required. FIPP p-cycles therefore offer a fully pre-connected, alternative to SBPP in which protection paths must be assembled on the fly from spare wavelength channels. Design results from small networks in [A. Kodian, W. D. Grover (2005)] showed that FIPP p-cycle designs can be as efficient as SBPP but it is very difficult to design larger networks using the ILP design model in [A. Kodian, W. D. Grover (2005)]. We now develop a new ILP model and a related heuristic method for FIPP p-cycle design that produces network designs with much faster runtimes. Results indicate that the heuristic generates FIPP p-cycle designs that have total capacity costs within 10-18% of optimally designed SBPP solutions.","PeriodicalId":415896,"journal":{"name":"DRCN 2005). Proceedings.5th International Workshop on Design of Reliable Communication Networks, 2005.","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"37","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DRCN 2005). Proceedings.5th International Workshop on Design of Reliable Communication Networks, 2005.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DRCN.2005.1563871","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 37
Abstract
Recent work has proposed the concept of failure-independent path-protecting (FIPP) p-cycles as a pre-connected, failure independent, path-protecting network architecture [A. Kodian, W. D. Grover (2005)]. FIPP p-cycles extend p-cycles by adding the property, like shared backup path protection (SBPP), of providing end-to-end failure independent path switching against either span or node failures. Especially in a transparent or translucent optical network, the property of pre-cross-connection of protection paths can be even more important than just increasing restoration-speed: when optical protection paths are pre-cross-connected, they can be guaranteed in advance to work when required. FIPP p-cycles therefore offer a fully pre-connected, alternative to SBPP in which protection paths must be assembled on the fly from spare wavelength channels. Design results from small networks in [A. Kodian, W. D. Grover (2005)] showed that FIPP p-cycle designs can be as efficient as SBPP but it is very difficult to design larger networks using the ILP design model in [A. Kodian, W. D. Grover (2005)]. We now develop a new ILP model and a related heuristic method for FIPP p-cycle design that produces network designs with much faster runtimes. Results indicate that the heuristic generates FIPP p-cycle designs that have total capacity costs within 10-18% of optimally designed SBPP solutions.
最近的研究提出了故障无关路径保护(FIPP) p环的概念,作为一种预连接的、故障无关的路径保护网络架构[a]。Kodian, W. D. Grover[2005]。FIPP p-cycles通过添加属性(如共享备份路径保护(SBPP))来扩展p-cycles,提供端到端故障独立的路径切换,以防止跨度或节点故障。特别是在透明或半透明光网络中,保护路径的预交联性能比仅仅提高恢复速度更为重要:当光保护路径进行预交联时,可以保证它们在需要时提前工作。因此,FIPP p周期提供了一个完全预连接的替代方案,在SBPP中,保护路径必须从备用波长通道动态组装。[A]小型网络的设计结果。Kodian, W. D. Grover(2005)]表明FIPP p-cycle设计可以像SBPP一样有效,但使用[A.]中的ILP设计模型设计更大的网络非常困难。Kodian, W. D. Grover[2005]。我们现在开发了一种新的ILP模型和一种相关的启发式方法,用于FIPP p周期设计,从而产生运行时间更快的网络设计。结果表明,启发式生成的FIPP p循环设计的总容量成本在优化设计的SBPP解决方案的10-18%以内。