Statistical Evaluation of Input-Side Metrics for Life Cycle Impact Assessment of Emerging Technologies

Yi Zhang, B. Bakshi
{"title":"Statistical Evaluation of Input-Side Metrics for Life Cycle Impact Assessment of Emerging Technologies","authors":"Yi Zhang, B. Bakshi","doi":"10.1109/ISEE.2007.369378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Life cycle assessment is a popular approach for evaluating environmental impact of technologies. However, it is often difficult to apply, especially to emerging technologies due to the difficulty of finding accurate output-side emissions and impact data. Usually, input-side data are more readily available, even for emerging technologies, and may provide a reasonable proxy for predicting the environmental impact associated with emissions. In this paper, this relationship is explored by case studies and regression of life cycle impact with input-side quantities of cumulative mass, energy, and exergy. As a single quantity, this study indicates that ecological cumulative exergy consumption may be best at predicting environmental impact. This work also confirms that if the input variables are separated, then nonrenewable energy use dominates overall impact. However, nonrenewable minerals and some renewable resources are also highly correlated with impact, and nonrenewable energy is only good at prediction of impact due to emission of CO2, SO2, and NO2. These preliminary results suggest the promise of using input-side metrics to predict life cycle environmental impact, and identifies areas of future work.","PeriodicalId":275164,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISEE.2007.369378","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Life cycle assessment is a popular approach for evaluating environmental impact of technologies. However, it is often difficult to apply, especially to emerging technologies due to the difficulty of finding accurate output-side emissions and impact data. Usually, input-side data are more readily available, even for emerging technologies, and may provide a reasonable proxy for predicting the environmental impact associated with emissions. In this paper, this relationship is explored by case studies and regression of life cycle impact with input-side quantities of cumulative mass, energy, and exergy. As a single quantity, this study indicates that ecological cumulative exergy consumption may be best at predicting environmental impact. This work also confirms that if the input variables are separated, then nonrenewable energy use dominates overall impact. However, nonrenewable minerals and some renewable resources are also highly correlated with impact, and nonrenewable energy is only good at prediction of impact due to emission of CO2, SO2, and NO2. These preliminary results suggest the promise of using input-side metrics to predict life cycle environmental impact, and identifies areas of future work.
新兴技术生命周期影响评估投入侧指标的统计评价
生命周期评价是评价技术环境影响的常用方法。然而,由于难以找到准确的产出侧排放和影响数据,因此往往难以应用,特别是对新兴技术。通常,投入方面的数据更容易获得,即使是新兴技术的数据,也可以作为预测与排放有关的环境影响的合理代理。本文通过案例研究和生命周期影响与输入侧累积质量、能量和能量的回归来探讨这种关系。作为一个单一的量,本研究表明,生态累积能源消耗可能是预测环境影响的最佳指标。这项工作还证实,如果将输入变量分开,那么不可再生能源的使用占总体影响的主导地位。然而,不可再生矿产和部分可再生资源也与冲击高度相关,不可再生能源仅擅长预测CO2、SO2和NO2的排放对冲击的影响。这些初步结果表明,使用投入侧指标来预测生命周期的环境影响,并确定未来工作的领域是有希望的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信