Conclusion

J. P. Baggett
{"title":"Conclusion","authors":"J. P. Baggett","doi":"10.18574/nyu/9781479874200.003.0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This conclusion begins by pointing out some of the differences between the foci and findings in this book and those addressed within the psychologist and philosopher William James’s classic The Varieties of Religious Experience. His book focused on religious conversion, whereas this one attends to atheists. James pays most attention to the psychological aspects of conversion, while this book draws readers’ attentions to aspects of social context that shape the expression and experience of atheism. While James argues that religious ideas are variable and only the feeling of finding the sacred is consistent across individual cases, this book shows that, for atheists, the idea of the science versus religion “conflict myth” is constant, whereas the feelings that authenticate this idea are actually variable. This chapter concludes with suggestions about how atheists could offer a more incisive contribution to American public discourse than they do at present.","PeriodicalId":300188,"journal":{"name":"The Varieties of Nonreligious Experience","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Varieties of Nonreligious Experience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479874200.003.0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This conclusion begins by pointing out some of the differences between the foci and findings in this book and those addressed within the psychologist and philosopher William James’s classic The Varieties of Religious Experience. His book focused on religious conversion, whereas this one attends to atheists. James pays most attention to the psychological aspects of conversion, while this book draws readers’ attentions to aspects of social context that shape the expression and experience of atheism. While James argues that religious ideas are variable and only the feeling of finding the sacred is consistent across individual cases, this book shows that, for atheists, the idea of the science versus religion “conflict myth” is constant, whereas the feelings that authenticate this idea are actually variable. This chapter concludes with suggestions about how atheists could offer a more incisive contribution to American public discourse than they do at present.
结论
这个结论首先指出了本书的焦点和发现与心理学家和哲学家威廉·詹姆斯的经典著作《宗教经验的多样性》中的一些不同之处。他的书关注的是宗教皈依,而这本书关注的是无神论者。詹姆斯最关注的是皈依的心理方面,而这本书则把读者的注意力吸引到塑造无神论表达和经验的社会背景方面。虽然詹姆斯认为宗教观念是多变的,只有找到神圣的感觉在个别情况下是一致的,但这本书表明,对于无神论者来说,科学与宗教“冲突神话”的观念是不变的,而证实这种观念的情感实际上是多变的。本章最后提出了一些建议,关于无神论者如何能比现在对美国公共话语做出更深刻的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信