The Origin of the Division between Middle Platonism and Neoplatonism

L. Catana
{"title":"The Origin of the Division between Middle Platonism and Neoplatonism","authors":"L. Catana","doi":"10.1515/apeiron-2012-0029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The division of Ancient Platonism into Middle Platonism and Neoplatonism is a fairly new one. The conceptual foundation of this division was cemented in Jacob Brucker’s pioneering Historia critica philosophiae (1742-67). In the 1770s and 1780s, the term ‘Neoplatonism’ was coined on the basis of Brucker’s analysis. Three historiographical concepts were decisive to Brucker: ‘system of philosophy’, ‘eclecticism’ and ‘syncretism’. By means of these concepts, he characterized Middle Platonism and Neoplatonism as opposing philosophical movements, the former being a genuine form of Platonism, the latter a false form. However, the division is untenable and we ought to abandon it.","PeriodicalId":355207,"journal":{"name":"International Archives of the History of Ideas Archives internationales d'histoire des idées","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Archives of the History of Ideas Archives internationales d'histoire des idées","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/apeiron-2012-0029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Abstract The division of Ancient Platonism into Middle Platonism and Neoplatonism is a fairly new one. The conceptual foundation of this division was cemented in Jacob Brucker’s pioneering Historia critica philosophiae (1742-67). In the 1770s and 1780s, the term ‘Neoplatonism’ was coined on the basis of Brucker’s analysis. Three historiographical concepts were decisive to Brucker: ‘system of philosophy’, ‘eclecticism’ and ‘syncretism’. By means of these concepts, he characterized Middle Platonism and Neoplatonism as opposing philosophical movements, the former being a genuine form of Platonism, the latter a false form. However, the division is untenable and we ought to abandon it.
中柏拉图主义与新柏拉图主义之分的起源
古代柏拉图主义分为中柏拉图主义和新柏拉图主义是一个比较新的划分。这种划分的概念基础在雅各布·布鲁克开创性的《批判哲学史》(1742- 1767)中得到了巩固。在18世纪70年代和80年代,“新柏拉图主义”这个词是在布鲁克分析的基础上创造出来的。三个史学概念对布鲁克来说是决定性的:“哲学体系”、“折衷主义”和“融合主义”。通过这些概念,他把中柏拉图主义和新柏拉图主义定性为对立的哲学运动,前者是真正的柏拉图主义,后者是虚假的柏拉图主义。然而,这种分裂是站不住脚的,我们应该放弃它。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信