Automating the Process to Quantify Cyber-Physical Risk with Contingency Analysis and User Input

Hao Huang, Dustin Gray, Juan Mendoza, K. Davis
{"title":"Automating the Process to Quantify Cyber-Physical Risk with Contingency Analysis and User Input","authors":"Hao Huang, Dustin Gray, Juan Mendoza, K. Davis","doi":"10.1109/NAPS52732.2021.9654646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Obtaining enough situational awareness is a critical task for power system security and reliability. With thousands of devices and various adversaries, it is hard to assess the impact of those devices under adversaries on power systems. The lack of enough situational awareness can lead the operators to misunderstand the system and make inappropriate decisions. Thus, this paper presents a framework to consider different types of contingencies for a comprehensive device-oriented risk assessment. The proposed framework considers three aspects, including the Steady State Contingency, Transient State Contingency, and Device Model Validation. Corresponding metrics have been utilized to evaluate the power system elements with respect to power system security. With the input information, the proposed framework streamlines and automates the process of quantifying the risk of different devices through different types of contingency analyses and metrics. In this way, operators can get comprehensive situational awareness to ensure the security of the system and avoid potential cascading failures. This paper uses the synthetic 200-bus case (ACTIVSg200) to illustrate the process of quantifying cyber-physical risk using the proposed framework.","PeriodicalId":123077,"journal":{"name":"2021 North American Power Symposium (NAPS)","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 North American Power Symposium (NAPS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NAPS52732.2021.9654646","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Obtaining enough situational awareness is a critical task for power system security and reliability. With thousands of devices and various adversaries, it is hard to assess the impact of those devices under adversaries on power systems. The lack of enough situational awareness can lead the operators to misunderstand the system and make inappropriate decisions. Thus, this paper presents a framework to consider different types of contingencies for a comprehensive device-oriented risk assessment. The proposed framework considers three aspects, including the Steady State Contingency, Transient State Contingency, and Device Model Validation. Corresponding metrics have been utilized to evaluate the power system elements with respect to power system security. With the input information, the proposed framework streamlines and automates the process of quantifying the risk of different devices through different types of contingency analyses and metrics. In this way, operators can get comprehensive situational awareness to ensure the security of the system and avoid potential cascading failures. This paper uses the synthetic 200-bus case (ACTIVSg200) to illustrate the process of quantifying cyber-physical risk using the proposed framework.
自动化过程量化与应急分析和用户输入的网络物理风险
获得足够的态势感知是电力系统安全可靠的关键任务。由于成千上万的设备和各种各样的对手,很难评估这些设备在对手下对电力系统的影响。缺乏足够的态势感知可能导致操作员误解系统并做出不适当的决策。因此,本文提出了一个框架来考虑不同类型的突发事件,以进行全面的面向设备的风险评估。提出的框架考虑了三个方面,包括稳态偶然性,瞬态偶然性和设备模型验证。利用相应的指标对电力系统各要素进行安全评价。通过输入信息,提议的框架通过不同类型的应急分析和度量来简化和自动化量化不同设备风险的过程。通过这种方式,操作人员可以获得全面的态势感知,以确保系统的安全,避免潜在的级联故障。本文使用综合200总线案例(ACTIVSg200)来说明使用所提出的框架量化网络物理风险的过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信