{"title":"Indigenous History in Gould’s Book of Fish","authors":"Daniel Norberg","doi":"10.35515/ZFA/ASJ.32/2018.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Other publications – such as Theodore Dalrymple’s “Why Intellectuals Like Genocide” from 2007 or the now infamous work by Keith Windschuttle from 2002 The Fabrication of Aboriginal History: Van Diemen’s Land, 1803–1847 – highlight the vehemence and emotion involved in the argument (cf. Madley: 77). More so for Aboriginal people; Brewster (3) quotes various voices on the subject of a living memory who say that as long as the conditions of the past are the conditions of the present, the past is not past; that victors can afford to forget while the ‘losers’ cannot; and that Aboriginal remembrance is a living experience of the past. Stephens (n.p.) states that the urge to rewrite Australia’s history appears to be driven by politics rather than a desire for truth and refers to The History Wars:","PeriodicalId":331318,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift für Australienstudien / Australian Studies Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift für Australienstudien / Australian Studies Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35515/ZFA/ASJ.32/2018.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Other publications – such as Theodore Dalrymple’s “Why Intellectuals Like Genocide” from 2007 or the now infamous work by Keith Windschuttle from 2002 The Fabrication of Aboriginal History: Van Diemen’s Land, 1803–1847 – highlight the vehemence and emotion involved in the argument (cf. Madley: 77). More so for Aboriginal people; Brewster (3) quotes various voices on the subject of a living memory who say that as long as the conditions of the past are the conditions of the present, the past is not past; that victors can afford to forget while the ‘losers’ cannot; and that Aboriginal remembrance is a living experience of the past. Stephens (n.p.) states that the urge to rewrite Australia’s history appears to be driven by politics rather than a desire for truth and refers to The History Wars: