Classification of Cardiometabolic Risk in Early Middle-aged Women for Preventive Self-care Apps

Amaury Trujillo, Maria Claudia Buzzi
{"title":"Classification of Cardiometabolic Risk in Early Middle-aged Women for Preventive Self-care Apps","authors":"Amaury Trujillo, Maria Claudia Buzzi","doi":"10.1145/3314183.3323677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Menopause is a natural part of women's aging, but is often accompanied by an increased cardiometabolic risk (CMR), of which most women are unaware. Preventive self-care via mobile health applications (apps) is a promising way to address this issue, but research on apps for middle-aged women is limited. Further, modeling such risk is no trivial task in a non-clinical self-care context, where most biomarkers used in traditional models are unavailable. Machine learning (ML) is a potential option in this regard, but many ML approaches are effectively black box models, which leads to doubt regarding their trustworthiness. Therefore, in this paper we analyze and compare different decision tree and rule-based classification models, considered to be inherently interpretable, to assess the CMR of early middle-aged women in the context of a non-clinical self-care app. For this, we first defined a set of candidate determinants based on the feedback of potential users and domain experts. We then used data from a subset of the participants in the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN) to compare these ML models with traditional risk score models, based on five cardiometabolic 10-year outcomes: heart attack, stroke, angina pectoris, diabetes, and metabolic syndrome.","PeriodicalId":240482,"journal":{"name":"Adjunct Publication of the 27th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adjunct Publication of the 27th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3314183.3323677","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Menopause is a natural part of women's aging, but is often accompanied by an increased cardiometabolic risk (CMR), of which most women are unaware. Preventive self-care via mobile health applications (apps) is a promising way to address this issue, but research on apps for middle-aged women is limited. Further, modeling such risk is no trivial task in a non-clinical self-care context, where most biomarkers used in traditional models are unavailable. Machine learning (ML) is a potential option in this regard, but many ML approaches are effectively black box models, which leads to doubt regarding their trustworthiness. Therefore, in this paper we analyze and compare different decision tree and rule-based classification models, considered to be inherently interpretable, to assess the CMR of early middle-aged women in the context of a non-clinical self-care app. For this, we first defined a set of candidate determinants based on the feedback of potential users and domain experts. We then used data from a subset of the participants in the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN) to compare these ML models with traditional risk score models, based on five cardiometabolic 10-year outcomes: heart attack, stroke, angina pectoris, diabetes, and metabolic syndrome.
预防性自我保健应用程序对早期中年妇女心脏代谢风险的分类
更年期是女性衰老的自然组成部分,但通常伴随着心脏代谢风险(CMR)的增加,而大多数女性都没有意识到这一点。通过移动健康应用程序(app)进行预防性自我保健是解决这一问题的一个有希望的方法,但针对中年女性的应用程序的研究有限。此外,在非临床自我保健环境中,这种风险建模不是一项微不足道的任务,因为传统模型中使用的大多数生物标志物都不可用。在这方面,机器学习(ML)是一个潜在的选择,但许多ML方法实际上是黑盒模型,这导致人们对它们的可信度产生怀疑。因此,在本文中,我们分析和比较了不同的决策树和基于规则的分类模型,这些模型被认为是固有可解释性的,以评估非临床自我护理应用程序背景下早期中年女性的CMR。为此,我们首先根据潜在用户和领域专家的反馈定义了一组候选决定因素。然后我们使用的数据的一个子集参与全国妇女健康研究(天鹅)来比较这些ML模型与传统风险评分模型,基于五个代谢疾病10年期的结果:心脏病、中风、心绞痛,糖尿病和代谢综合征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信