Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Global Labor Governance: Organizing, Legal Mobilization and Decolonization

Chaumtoli Huq
{"title":"Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Global Labor Governance: Organizing, Legal Mobilization and Decolonization","authors":"Chaumtoli Huq","doi":"10.36642/mjil.43.2.interdisciplinary","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Labor movements around the world have explored various forms of global labor governance mechanisms to hold multinational companies accountable for ensuring workers’ and human rights throughout their supply chains. This article examines H&M’s Global Framework Agreement (H&M GFA) and its implementation in three Asian producing countries: Bangladesh, Cambodia, and India to develop some insights on global labor governance. H&M commits to foster trade union and labor rights but is not legally obligated to take steps to actualize those rights. The article contextualizes and signify GFAs importance within international human rights and labor law by referring to business and human rights instruments and by utilizing a social movement perspective. Drawing from three main social movement oriented theoretical disciplines: organizing, legal mobilization and decolonization, this paper evaluates the H&M GFA and GFAs generally. The article pays particular attention to GFAs’ impact on gender because the majority of the workers in the global garment industry are women. In the Asian context, GFAs must be strengthened to be binding on companies to enforce the fundamental labor right to freedom of association, collective bargaining and non-discrimination. They must proactively involve national unions in the negotiation, implementation, and enforcement of the agreement to ensure their full participation and seek their meaningful input on the socio-political context of the producing countries. They must be conceived with a grassroots, multi-layered approach to governance to enable workers from the factory level to the international level to exercise their power and agency to establish labor standards and resolve disputes, form worker-led organizations such as trade unions, and facilitate implementation procedures that are binding on multinational corporations. Further, in the garment industry, the GFAs must proactively address gender related concerns and provide clear avenues for women workers to raise these issues. Notwithstanding these challenges to GFAs, among labor governance strategies within international human rights law, it has the most promise in actualizing labor and human rights.","PeriodicalId":331401,"journal":{"name":"Michigan Journal of International Law","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Michigan Journal of International Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36642/mjil.43.2.interdisciplinary","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Labor movements around the world have explored various forms of global labor governance mechanisms to hold multinational companies accountable for ensuring workers’ and human rights throughout their supply chains. This article examines H&M’s Global Framework Agreement (H&M GFA) and its implementation in three Asian producing countries: Bangladesh, Cambodia, and India to develop some insights on global labor governance. H&M commits to foster trade union and labor rights but is not legally obligated to take steps to actualize those rights. The article contextualizes and signify GFAs importance within international human rights and labor law by referring to business and human rights instruments and by utilizing a social movement perspective. Drawing from three main social movement oriented theoretical disciplines: organizing, legal mobilization and decolonization, this paper evaluates the H&M GFA and GFAs generally. The article pays particular attention to GFAs’ impact on gender because the majority of the workers in the global garment industry are women. In the Asian context, GFAs must be strengthened to be binding on companies to enforce the fundamental labor right to freedom of association, collective bargaining and non-discrimination. They must proactively involve national unions in the negotiation, implementation, and enforcement of the agreement to ensure their full participation and seek their meaningful input on the socio-political context of the producing countries. They must be conceived with a grassroots, multi-layered approach to governance to enable workers from the factory level to the international level to exercise their power and agency to establish labor standards and resolve disputes, form worker-led organizations such as trade unions, and facilitate implementation procedures that are binding on multinational corporations. Further, in the garment industry, the GFAs must proactively address gender related concerns and provide clear avenues for women workers to raise these issues. Notwithstanding these challenges to GFAs, among labor governance strategies within international human rights law, it has the most promise in actualizing labor and human rights.
全球劳工治理的跨学科视角:组织、法律动员和非殖民化
世界各地的劳工运动已经探索了各种形式的全球劳工治理机制,以使跨国公司对确保其整个供应链中的工人和人权负责。本文考察了H&M的全球框架协议(H&M GFA)及其在三个亚洲生产国:孟加拉国、柬埔寨和印度的实施情况,以对全球劳工治理产生一些见解。H&M承诺促进工会和劳工权利,但没有法律义务采取措施实现这些权利。本文通过参考商业和人权文书并利用社会运动的观点,将gfa在国际人权和劳动法中的重要性置于背景下并加以说明。从三个主要的社会运动导向的理论学科:组织,法律动员和非殖民化,本文评估了H&M的GFA和GFA一般。这篇文章特别关注gfa对性别的影响,因为全球服装业的大多数工人是女性。在亚洲,必须加强gfa,使其对公司具有约束力,以执行结社自由、集体谈判和不歧视等基本劳工权利。它们必须积极地让国家工会参与协议的谈判、实施和执行,以确保它们的充分参与,并在生产国的社会政治背景下寻求它们有意义的投入。它们必须以一种基层的、多层次的治理方式来构思,使从工厂一级到国际一级的工人能够行使他们的权力和代理权,以制定劳动标准和解决纠纷,形成工人领导的组织,如工会,并促进对跨国公司具有约束力的实施程序。此外,在服装行业,gfa必须积极解决与性别有关的问题,并为女工提出这些问题提供明确的途径。尽管gfa面临这些挑战,但在国际人权法中的劳工治理策略中,它在实现劳工和人权方面最有希望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信