The Political Economy of Rights to the COVID-19 Vaccine in Southern Africa

Miriam Hofisi, M. Lukamba
{"title":"The Political Economy of Rights to the COVID-19 Vaccine in Southern Africa","authors":"Miriam Hofisi, M. Lukamba","doi":"10.31920/2634-3649/2022/siv2a7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Access to vaccine and medical technologies is a right derived from the right to health as enshrined in the International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights and other international and national conventions. However, there is a void between the commitment in principle to enhancing this access as part of the right to benefit from scientific progress on the one hand, and technical considerations surrounding universal access to health goods on the other hand. In Southern Africa, studies on the COVID-19 vaccine focused on how the international community has failed to commit itself to helping developing countries in providing aid towards vaccine procurement. Little effort has been directed at exploring alternatives to the manufacturing of generic vaccine. The study aimed to explore the possibilities of increasing the availability of generic vaccines in Southern Africa. An exploration of the potential of state institutions together with Africa-based pharmaceutical companies to ascertain the possibility of carrying out the task of manufacturing the vaccine was done. This was done through document analysis from literature that has been published on vaccine production of even other diseases as well as that of COVID-19. Literature comprised of official documents, academic publications as well as company documents. In addition to that, an analysis of documents on the enabling legal framework was also conducted. Through document analysis, national medicine policies that were reviewed indicated that although health is a constitutional right, the drafting of it did not factor the element that lack of access to vaccines seriously compromise the right to health. There was inadequate availability of human expertise, while commitment at national level was insignificant. On the enabling legal framework, it was noted that the World Trade Organisation, Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property also created inequality of access by prioritising intellectual rights more than access to health. Given the lack of expertise, insignificant national commitment, and promotion of the rights to health in some Southern African states, a higher mortality risk is imminent. Hence the need for a comprehensive establishment of equitable access to COVID-19 vaccine in Southern Africa countries.","PeriodicalId":421107,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Development Studies (formerly AFFRIKA Journal of Politics, Economics and Society)","volume":"06 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Development Studies (formerly AFFRIKA Journal of Politics, Economics and Society)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31920/2634-3649/2022/siv2a7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Access to vaccine and medical technologies is a right derived from the right to health as enshrined in the International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights and other international and national conventions. However, there is a void between the commitment in principle to enhancing this access as part of the right to benefit from scientific progress on the one hand, and technical considerations surrounding universal access to health goods on the other hand. In Southern Africa, studies on the COVID-19 vaccine focused on how the international community has failed to commit itself to helping developing countries in providing aid towards vaccine procurement. Little effort has been directed at exploring alternatives to the manufacturing of generic vaccine. The study aimed to explore the possibilities of increasing the availability of generic vaccines in Southern Africa. An exploration of the potential of state institutions together with Africa-based pharmaceutical companies to ascertain the possibility of carrying out the task of manufacturing the vaccine was done. This was done through document analysis from literature that has been published on vaccine production of even other diseases as well as that of COVID-19. Literature comprised of official documents, academic publications as well as company documents. In addition to that, an analysis of documents on the enabling legal framework was also conducted. Through document analysis, national medicine policies that were reviewed indicated that although health is a constitutional right, the drafting of it did not factor the element that lack of access to vaccines seriously compromise the right to health. There was inadequate availability of human expertise, while commitment at national level was insignificant. On the enabling legal framework, it was noted that the World Trade Organisation, Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property also created inequality of access by prioritising intellectual rights more than access to health. Given the lack of expertise, insignificant national commitment, and promotion of the rights to health in some Southern African states, a higher mortality risk is imminent. Hence the need for a comprehensive establishment of equitable access to COVID-19 vaccine in Southern Africa countries.
南部非洲COVID-19疫苗权利的政治经济学
获得疫苗和医疗技术是《经济、社会、文化权利国际公约》及其他国际和国家公约所载健康权衍生的一项权利。然而,一方面在原则上承诺加强这种获取作为受益于科学进步的权利的一部分,另一方面围绕普遍获得卫生产品的技术考虑之间存在空白。在南部非洲,关于COVID-19疫苗的研究侧重于国际社会如何未能承诺帮助发展中国家为疫苗采购提供援助。很少有人致力于探索生产非专利疫苗的替代品。这项研究的目的是探讨在南部非洲增加非专利疫苗供应的可能性。对国家机构与非洲制药公司合作的潜力进行了探索,以确定是否有可能完成生产疫苗的任务。这是通过对已发表的关于其他疾病和COVID-19疫苗生产的文献进行文件分析得出的。文献包括官方文件、学术出版物和公司文件。除此之外,还对有关授权法律框架的文件进行了分析。通过文件分析,审查的国家医药政策表明,虽然健康是一项宪法权利,但它的起草没有考虑到无法获得疫苗严重损害健康权这一因素。人力专门知识不足,而国家一级的承诺微不足道。关于有利的法律框架,有人指出,世界贸易组织《与贸易有关的知识产权问题》也造成了获取机会的不平等,因为它将知识产权置于获得健康的优先地位之上。由于缺乏专门知识,国家承诺微不足道,以及一些南部非洲国家对健康权的促进,更高的死亡率风险迫在眉睫。因此,需要在南部非洲国家全面建立公平获得COVID-19疫苗的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信