Interference cancelation vs. interference suppression in ad hoc networks

A. Hasan, J. Andrews
{"title":"Interference cancelation vs. interference suppression in ad hoc networks","authors":"A. Hasan, J. Andrews","doi":"10.1109/MILCOM.2008.4753293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"DS-CDMA physical layer with MAC scheduling is an effective technique to combat interference in ad hoc networks. The reduction in SINR requirement due to spreading gain provides attractive robustness against aggregate interference of more distant interferers. However, nearby interferers that can still cause an outage are inhibited through MAC scheduling. An alternative to scheduling is to employ interference-aware receivers that exploit information in the interfering signal with the goal of negating its effect on the desired transmission. In this paper interference supersession using MAC scheduling is compared with interference cancelation by employing successive interference cancelation (SIC). The results show that under strict outage constraint, inhibiting nearby nodes through scheduling is a better option than to employ SIC with imperfect channel estimation.","PeriodicalId":434891,"journal":{"name":"MILCOM 2008 - 2008 IEEE Military Communications Conference","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MILCOM 2008 - 2008 IEEE Military Communications Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MILCOM.2008.4753293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

DS-CDMA physical layer with MAC scheduling is an effective technique to combat interference in ad hoc networks. The reduction in SINR requirement due to spreading gain provides attractive robustness against aggregate interference of more distant interferers. However, nearby interferers that can still cause an outage are inhibited through MAC scheduling. An alternative to scheduling is to employ interference-aware receivers that exploit information in the interfering signal with the goal of negating its effect on the desired transmission. In this paper interference supersession using MAC scheduling is compared with interference cancelation by employing successive interference cancelation (SIC). The results show that under strict outage constraint, inhibiting nearby nodes through scheduling is a better option than to employ SIC with imperfect channel estimation.
自组织网络中的干扰消除与干扰抑制
带MAC调度的DS-CDMA物理层是一种有效的对抗ad hoc网络干扰的技术。扩频增益对信噪比要求的降低提供了对较远干扰的聚集干扰的鲁棒性。但是,通过MAC调度,仍然可以抑制附近可能导致中断的干扰。调度的另一种选择是使用干扰感知接收器,利用干扰信号中的信息,以消除其对期望传输的影响。本文比较了采用MAC调度的干扰消除与采用逐次干扰消除(SIC)的干扰消除。结果表明,在严格的中断约束下,通过调度抑制附近节点比使用不完全信道估计的SIC更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信