Efficient Optimization of Field Management Strategies in Reservoir Simulation

M. A. Elfeel, Samad Ali, M. Giddins
{"title":"Efficient Optimization of Field Management Strategies in Reservoir Simulation","authors":"M. A. Elfeel, Samad Ali, M. Giddins","doi":"10.2118/196662-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Standard approaches to optimization under uncertainty in reservoir simulation require use of multiple realizations, with variable parameters representing operational constraints and actions as well as uncertain scenarios. We will show how appropriate use of local optimization within the simulation model, using customized logic for field management strategies, can bring improved workflow flexibility and efficiency, by reducing the effort needed for uncertainty iterations.\n To achieve meaningful forecasts for an ensemble of uncertain scenarios, it is important to distinguish between different types of decision. Investment decisions, such as facilities sizing, depend on global unknowns and must be optimized for the complete ensemble. Operational actions, such as closing a valve, can be optimized instantaneously for individual scenarios, using measurable information, although subject to constraints determined at a global level. In this study, we implement local optimization procedures within simulation cases, combining customized objective criteria to rank reactive or proactive actions, with the ability to query reservoir flow entities at appropriate frequencies.\n The methods presented in the paper can be used for reactive response modeling for smart downhole control; optimization of ESP/PCP pump performance; and implementation of production plans subject to defined downstream limits. For selected cases, we compare the advantages and disadvantages of the local optimization approach with standardized \"big-loop\" uncertainty workflows. The methodology can significantly reduce optimization costs, particularly for high-frequency actions, achieving similar objective function values in a fraction of the time needed for post-processing optimizers. Use of tailored scripting provides the capability to modernize the logic framework for field management decisions, with realistic representation of smart field equipment and flow entities at any level of complexity.\n Use of efficient workflows as described in this paper can reduce the cost of multiple realization studies significantly, or enable engineers to consider a wider range of possible scenarios, for deeper understanding and better risk mitigation.","PeriodicalId":318637,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Tue, September 17, 2019","volume":"125 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Tue, September 17, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/196662-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Standard approaches to optimization under uncertainty in reservoir simulation require use of multiple realizations, with variable parameters representing operational constraints and actions as well as uncertain scenarios. We will show how appropriate use of local optimization within the simulation model, using customized logic for field management strategies, can bring improved workflow flexibility and efficiency, by reducing the effort needed for uncertainty iterations. To achieve meaningful forecasts for an ensemble of uncertain scenarios, it is important to distinguish between different types of decision. Investment decisions, such as facilities sizing, depend on global unknowns and must be optimized for the complete ensemble. Operational actions, such as closing a valve, can be optimized instantaneously for individual scenarios, using measurable information, although subject to constraints determined at a global level. In this study, we implement local optimization procedures within simulation cases, combining customized objective criteria to rank reactive or proactive actions, with the ability to query reservoir flow entities at appropriate frequencies. The methods presented in the paper can be used for reactive response modeling for smart downhole control; optimization of ESP/PCP pump performance; and implementation of production plans subject to defined downstream limits. For selected cases, we compare the advantages and disadvantages of the local optimization approach with standardized "big-loop" uncertainty workflows. The methodology can significantly reduce optimization costs, particularly for high-frequency actions, achieving similar objective function values in a fraction of the time needed for post-processing optimizers. Use of tailored scripting provides the capability to modernize the logic framework for field management decisions, with realistic representation of smart field equipment and flow entities at any level of complexity. Use of efficient workflows as described in this paper can reduce the cost of multiple realization studies significantly, or enable engineers to consider a wider range of possible scenarios, for deeper understanding and better risk mitigation.
油藏模拟中现场管理策略的高效优化
油藏模拟中不确定条件下的标准优化方法需要使用多种实现,使用可变参数表示操作约束和行动以及不确定情景。我们将展示如何在仿真模型中适当地使用局部优化,为现场管理策略使用定制的逻辑,通过减少不确定性迭代所需的工作量来提高工作流的灵活性和效率。为了对不确定情景的集合实现有意义的预测,区分不同类型的决策是很重要的。投资决策,如设施规模,取决于全局未知因素,必须针对整体进行优化。操作动作,如关闭阀门,可以使用可测量的信息,针对单个场景即时优化,尽管受到全局层面确定的约束。在本研究中,我们在模拟案例中实施了局部优化程序,结合定制的客观标准对被动或主动行为进行排序,并能够以适当的频率查询水库流动实体。本文提出的方法可用于智能井下控制的反应响应建模;ESP/PCP泵性能优化;在规定的下游限制范围内执行生产计划。对于选定的案例,我们比较了局部优化方法与标准化“大循环”不确定性工作流的优缺点。该方法可以显著降低优化成本,特别是对于高频动作,在后处理优化器所需的一小部分时间内实现相似的目标函数值。定制脚本的使用为现场管理决策提供了现代化逻辑框架的能力,具有任何复杂程度的智能现场设备和流实体的现实表示。使用本文中描述的高效工作流程可以显著降低多个实现研究的成本,或者使工程师能够考虑更广泛的可能场景,以便更深入地理解和更好地降低风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信