Haemodynamic Responses to Sustained Contractions

Dr. A. R. Lind
{"title":"Haemodynamic Responses to Sustained Contractions","authors":"Dr. A. R. Lind","doi":"10.1136/bjsm.1.1.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During experiments to investigate the problem of muscular fatigue in sustained contractions, the blood flow through the forearm during hand-grip contractions at 1/3 maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) was found to be considerable, rising throughout the contraction (Clarke, Hellon & Lind, 1958). Further experiments showed an increase in blood flow through the whole forearm at all tensions from 30 to 70% MVC as measured by a plethysmograph. Thereafter, using a technique first described by Barcroft & Millen (1939), the temperatures of both active and inactive muscles in the contracting arm were measured before, during and after contractions. When this was done with and without artificial arterial occlusion of the arm, it was possible to show that all or nearly all the increase in blood flow through the arm during sustained contractions went to the active muscles, while the flow through the inactive muscles did not increase (Humphreys and Lind, 1963). In view of the surprisingly high blood pressures found during these contractions, there must have been a marked vasoconstriction in the inactive muscles. Another series of experiments (Lind, Taylor, Humphreys, Kennelly & Donald, 1963) examined both central and peripheral haemodynamic responses of four subjects to hand-grip contractions using more direct methods of measurement. Blood pressure and cardiac output were measured by intravascular techniques while pulse rate was measured by e.c.g. Blood flow through both active and inactive forearms was measured by plethysmograph. The magnitude of the haemodynamic responses may be judged from the actual experimental values from one subject before, during and after a 20% MVC contraction. Whereas the stroke volume increases during rhythmic contractions, it did not increase in these sustained contractions, and the rise in cardiac output appeared to depend solely on the rise in pulse rate. Furthermore, only small changes in systemic vascular resistance were found, compared to the marked fall usually observed during dynamic exercise. The blood flow through the resting forearm did not change in spite of the high blood pressure during work, denoting a vasoconstriction in the non-active muscles.","PeriodicalId":250837,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin - British Association of Sport and Medicine","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1964-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin - British Association of Sport and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.1.1.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During experiments to investigate the problem of muscular fatigue in sustained contractions, the blood flow through the forearm during hand-grip contractions at 1/3 maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) was found to be considerable, rising throughout the contraction (Clarke, Hellon & Lind, 1958). Further experiments showed an increase in blood flow through the whole forearm at all tensions from 30 to 70% MVC as measured by a plethysmograph. Thereafter, using a technique first described by Barcroft & Millen (1939), the temperatures of both active and inactive muscles in the contracting arm were measured before, during and after contractions. When this was done with and without artificial arterial occlusion of the arm, it was possible to show that all or nearly all the increase in blood flow through the arm during sustained contractions went to the active muscles, while the flow through the inactive muscles did not increase (Humphreys and Lind, 1963). In view of the surprisingly high blood pressures found during these contractions, there must have been a marked vasoconstriction in the inactive muscles. Another series of experiments (Lind, Taylor, Humphreys, Kennelly & Donald, 1963) examined both central and peripheral haemodynamic responses of four subjects to hand-grip contractions using more direct methods of measurement. Blood pressure and cardiac output were measured by intravascular techniques while pulse rate was measured by e.c.g. Blood flow through both active and inactive forearms was measured by plethysmograph. The magnitude of the haemodynamic responses may be judged from the actual experimental values from one subject before, during and after a 20% MVC contraction. Whereas the stroke volume increases during rhythmic contractions, it did not increase in these sustained contractions, and the rise in cardiac output appeared to depend solely on the rise in pulse rate. Furthermore, only small changes in systemic vascular resistance were found, compared to the marked fall usually observed during dynamic exercise. The blood flow through the resting forearm did not change in spite of the high blood pressure during work, denoting a vasoconstriction in the non-active muscles.
对持续收缩的血流动力学反应
在研究持续收缩时肌肉疲劳问题的实验中,发现在1/3最大自愿收缩(MVC)时,手掌收缩时通过前臂的血流量相当大,在整个收缩过程中上升(Clarke, Hellon & Lind, 1958)。进一步的实验表明,通过容积描记仪测量,在所有张力从30%到70% MVC时,整个前臂的血流量增加。此后,使用Barcroft & Millen(1939)首先描述的技术,在收缩之前、期间和之后测量收缩臂中活动和非活动肌肉的温度。无论是否对手臂进行人工动脉阻塞,都有可能表明,在持续收缩期间,所有或几乎所有通过手臂增加的血流量都流向了活跃肌肉,而通过不活跃肌肉的血流量没有增加(Humphreys和Lind, 1963)。鉴于在这些收缩过程中发现的惊人的高血压,在不活动的肌肉中一定有明显的血管收缩。另一系列实验(Lind, Taylor, Humphreys, Kennelly & Donald, 1963)使用更直接的测量方法检查了四名受试者对手掌收缩的中枢和外周血流动力学反应。用血管内技术测量血压和心输出量,用心电图法测量脉搏率。用体积描记仪测量活动和不活动前臂的血流量。血流动力学反应的大小可以从一个受试者在20% MVC收缩之前、期间和之后的实际实验值来判断。然而,在节律性收缩时,搏量增加,而在这些持续收缩时,它没有增加,心输出量的增加似乎完全依赖于脉搏率的增加。此外,与通常在动态运动中观察到的明显下降相比,全身血管阻力只有很小的变化。尽管在工作期间血压很高,但静息前臂的血流量并没有改变,这表明非活动肌肉的血管收缩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信