Proposal for a “Dual Scheme” model of statutory adjudication for the Australian building and construction industry

M. Brand, P. Davenport
{"title":"Proposal for a “Dual Scheme” model of statutory adjudication for the Australian building and construction industry","authors":"M. Brand, P. Davenport","doi":"10.1108/17561451111178452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to outline a proposal for a Dual Scheme model of statutory adjudication for the Australian building and construction industry.Design/methodology/approach – The paper deals with the security of payment problem in the Australian construction industry and the legislative response to that problem in New South Wales and elsewhere more generally. The paper highlights deficiencies in current adjudication schemes in Australia and proposes a revised methodology of adjudication by means of the proposed Dual Scheme model. The Dual Scheme is explained in detail and examples are given showing how the Dual Scheme would work in practice.Findings – The Dual Scheme of adjudication allows for adjudication of “progress claims” (just as they are adjudicated now under the “Defined Scheme”), but also provides for separately adjudicated “money claims” in a similar way to that done under the “Non‐specific Scheme”. Both parties to a construction contract can take advantage of adjudication un...","PeriodicalId":158465,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Law in The Built Environment","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Law in The Built Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/17561451111178452","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to outline a proposal for a Dual Scheme model of statutory adjudication for the Australian building and construction industry.Design/methodology/approach – The paper deals with the security of payment problem in the Australian construction industry and the legislative response to that problem in New South Wales and elsewhere more generally. The paper highlights deficiencies in current adjudication schemes in Australia and proposes a revised methodology of adjudication by means of the proposed Dual Scheme model. The Dual Scheme is explained in detail and examples are given showing how the Dual Scheme would work in practice.Findings – The Dual Scheme of adjudication allows for adjudication of “progress claims” (just as they are adjudicated now under the “Defined Scheme”), but also provides for separately adjudicated “money claims” in a similar way to that done under the “Non‐specific Scheme”. Both parties to a construction contract can take advantage of adjudication un...
关于澳大利亚建筑行业法定裁决“双重方案”模式的建议
目的-本文的目的是概述澳大利亚建筑和建筑业法定裁决的双重方案模式的建议。设计/方法/方法-本文涉及澳大利亚建筑行业的付款安全问题以及新南威尔士州和其他地方对该问题的立法反应。本文强调了澳大利亚现行裁决方案的不足,并通过拟议的双重方案模式提出了一种修订的裁决方法。详细解释了双重方案,并举例说明了双重方案如何在实践中工作。调查结果-双重裁决方案允许对“进度索赔”进行裁决(就像现在在“明确计划”下裁决的那样),但也规定了以类似于“非特定计划”的方式单独裁决的“金钱索赔”。建筑合同的双方都可以利用裁决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信