{"title":"Violence against women in politics","authors":"Zainab B. Alam","doi":"10.1075/jlac.00052.ala","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper explores the protest claims of Pakistani women against the everyday oppression of traditional gender\n roles and the complex backlash they provoke as an instance of violence against women in politics. Taking the annual Aurat\n March (Women’s March) as a focal point, I analyze the provocative placards and slogans that have gone viral in both\n traditional and digital media and investigate the misogynistic counter attacks launched by conservatives, men’s rights advocates,\n and anti-feminists. Contesting narrow definitions of the political in mainstream research, I argue that Aurat\n March protesters and activists are women in politics and that counter-discourses, designed to\n delegitimize the protest and the women’s issues it represents, constitute a mode of discursive violence that should be included in\n scholarly and activist discussions of violence against women in politics.","PeriodicalId":324436,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00052.ala","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
This paper explores the protest claims of Pakistani women against the everyday oppression of traditional gender
roles and the complex backlash they provoke as an instance of violence against women in politics. Taking the annual Aurat
March (Women’s March) as a focal point, I analyze the provocative placards and slogans that have gone viral in both
traditional and digital media and investigate the misogynistic counter attacks launched by conservatives, men’s rights advocates,
and anti-feminists. Contesting narrow definitions of the political in mainstream research, I argue that Aurat
March protesters and activists are women in politics and that counter-discourses, designed to
delegitimize the protest and the women’s issues it represents, constitute a mode of discursive violence that should be included in
scholarly and activist discussions of violence against women in politics.
本文探讨了巴基斯坦妇女对传统性别角色的日常压迫的抗议主张,以及她们作为政治中针对妇女的暴力行为的一个例子所引发的复杂反弹。我以一年一度的Aurat March (Women’s March)为焦点,分析了在传统媒体和数字媒体上疯传的挑衅性标语和口号,并调查了保守派、男性权利倡导者和反女权主义者发起的厌恶女性的反击。我反驳了主流研究中对政治的狭隘定义,认为Aurat March的抗议者和活动家是政治中的女性,而旨在使抗议及其所代表的女性问题合法化的反话语,构成了一种话语暴力模式,应该包括在针对政治中女性的暴力行为的学术和活动家讨论中。