Segregated Neighbourhoods and Their Integration Attempts: Participatory Slum-Upgrading in the Making

Tímea Csaba
{"title":"Segregated Neighbourhoods and Their Integration Attempts: Participatory Slum-Upgrading in the Making","authors":"Tímea Csaba","doi":"10.18485/arh_pt.2020.7.ch61","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the proliferation of informal settlements has gained pace around the world, often coupled with spatial and social segregation, the global community has made efforts to provide a set of norms to tackle the issue. From the UN Sustainable Development Goals, a clear message takes shape for urban experts and decision makers: the focus is from now on social inclusion and community building; a priority before infrastructural intervention. The offered tool, named Participatory Slum-upgrading Program (PSUP) draws up a guide suitable not only for the Global-South but for urban rehabilitation projects of segregated areas in the developed world, too. The challenge is not only to implement global recommendations to local context but to measure the projects’ effectiveness in order that we can learn from each other: to be able to decide at a glance whether a project supports social integration and strengthens communities. To answer this need, a tentative index is tested on two case-studies. One that had begun as an urban experiment but at the end turned out to be a model of social urban rehabilitation in Pécs (HU), and the second one in Siklós (HU) implementing the former model, is a live project, still running. The background and process of the two cases are analyzed according to the index to demonstrate their comformation to the PSUP principles. On the side, the importance of process-design will also be examined.","PeriodicalId":337051,"journal":{"name":"International Academic Conference on Places and Technologies","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Academic Conference on Places and Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18485/arh_pt.2020.7.ch61","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As the proliferation of informal settlements has gained pace around the world, often coupled with spatial and social segregation, the global community has made efforts to provide a set of norms to tackle the issue. From the UN Sustainable Development Goals, a clear message takes shape for urban experts and decision makers: the focus is from now on social inclusion and community building; a priority before infrastructural intervention. The offered tool, named Participatory Slum-upgrading Program (PSUP) draws up a guide suitable not only for the Global-South but for urban rehabilitation projects of segregated areas in the developed world, too. The challenge is not only to implement global recommendations to local context but to measure the projects’ effectiveness in order that we can learn from each other: to be able to decide at a glance whether a project supports social integration and strengthens communities. To answer this need, a tentative index is tested on two case-studies. One that had begun as an urban experiment but at the end turned out to be a model of social urban rehabilitation in Pécs (HU), and the second one in Siklós (HU) implementing the former model, is a live project, still running. The background and process of the two cases are analyzed according to the index to demonstrate their comformation to the PSUP principles. On the side, the importance of process-design will also be examined.
隔离社区及其融合尝试:参与式贫民窟改造过程
随着非正式住区在世界各地迅速扩散,往往伴随着空间和社会隔离,国际社会已作出努力,提供一套处理这一问题的准则。联合国可持续发展目标向城市专家和决策者传达了一个明确的信息:从现在开始,重点是社会包容和社区建设;优先于基础设施干预。所提供的工具名为参与式贫民窟改造计划(PSUP),它不仅适用于全球南方国家,也适用于发达国家隔离地区的城市改造项目。我们面临的挑战不仅是根据当地情况实施全球建议,而且是衡量项目的有效性,以便我们能够相互学习:能够一目了然地决定一个项目是否支持社会融合和加强社区。为了满足这一需求,在两个案例研究中测试了一个暂定指数。一个是作为一个城市实验开始的,但最终成为psamacs (HU)的社会城市重建模型,第二个是在Siklós (HU)实施前一个模型,是一个活体项目,仍在运行。根据指标分析了这两个案例的背景和过程,论证了它们符合PSUP原则。在另一方面,过程设计的重要性也将被检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信